Cited by 161Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisAdversarial Robustness in Machine Learning

Hybrid quantum–classical generative adversarial networks for image generation via learning discrete distribution

Zhou, Nan-Run, Zhang, Tian-Feng, Xie, Xin-Wen, Wu, Jun-Yun·2023·Signal Processing Image Communication

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.image.2022.116891

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhou, N.-R., Zhang, T.-F., Xie, X.-W., & Wu, J.-Y.
Affiliations
Nanchang University (CN)
Venue
Signal Processing Image Communication
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-01
Volume
110
Pages
116891
ISSN
0923-5965 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4308033654
Cited by
161
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 5
FWCI
12.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Signal Processing Image Communication (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (61861029)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Keywords
quantum generative adversarial networks, hybrid quantum-classical neural networks, image generation, quantum machine learning, MNIST, Fashion-MNIST

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review