Cited by 281Image and Object Detection TechniquesAdvanced Vision and ImagingAdvanced Statistical Methods and Models

Randomized RANSAC with T, test

Matas, J, Chum, O·2004·Image and Vision Computing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.imavis.2004.02.009

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Matas, J., & Chum, O.
Affiliations
  • University of Surrey (GB)
  • Czech Technical University in Prague (CZ)
Corresponding author
Chum, O
Venue
Image and Vision Computing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-09
Volume
22
Issue
10
Pages
837-842
ISSN
0262-8856 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2129363926
Cited by
281
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 20
FWCI
11.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Image and Vision Computing (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission
  • Grantová Agentura České Republiky
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Object Detection Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
Keywords
RANSAC, robust estimation, outlier removal, hypothesis evaluation, hypothesis testing, computational efficiency, model parameter estimation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review