Cited by 72Emotion and Mood RecognitionHuman Pose and Action RecognitionFace recognition and analysis

Recognizing expressions from face and body gesture by temporal normalized motion and appearance features

Chen, Shizhi, Tian, YingLi, Liu, Qingshan, Metaxas, Dimitris N.·2013·Image and Vision Computing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.imavis.2012.06.014

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Manual feature fusion techniques do not take into consideration the inner correlation between face expression and body motion.

    “Both works use the same solution based on manual feature fusion, which does not take into consideration the inner correlation between face expression and the body motion, but fused both of these features using a methodical scheme.”
  • The restrictions of each feature extraction technique are accumulated when features are fused into one feature vector, reducing the capability of generalization of models.

    “The works of Chen et al. (2013) and Gunes and Piccardi (2009) use several different feature extraction techniques, and perform the feature fusion by uniting all features in one feature vector.The restrictions of each technique are accumulated, reducing the capability of generalization of their models.”
  • The CNN has competitive results compared to the models of Chen et al. (2013) and Gunes and Piccardi (2009), and the MCCNN implementation outperformed these models.

    “This shows that the CNN has competitive results, when compared to the models of Chen et al. (2013) and Gunes and Piccardi (2009), and when using the MCCNN implementation, it was possible to outperform these models.”
  • The proposed model improves the accuracy by more than 6% compared to Chen et al. (2013).

    “The proposed model improves the accuracy by more than 6% compared to Chen et al. (2013).”
  • Our model achieves higher accuracy for the experiments with Face expression and Multimodal experiments, compared with the results reported in Chen et al. (2013).

    “Our model achieves higher accuracy for the experiments with Face expression and Multimodal experiments, compared with the results reported in Chen et al. (2013).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 53 · Cited by 72

Authors
Chen, S., Tian, Y., Liu, Q., & Metaxas, D. N.
Affiliations
  • City College of New York (US)
  • Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology (CN)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
Tian, YingLi
Venue
Image and Vision Computing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-02
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
175-185
ISSN
0262-8856 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2072064926
Cited by
72
References
53
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
10.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Image and Vision Computing (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (Cooperative Remote Sensing Science and Technology (CREST) Fellowship)
  • U.S. Department of Homeland Security
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DE-AC05-06OR23100)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Human Pose and Action Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
Keywords
affect recognition, facial expression recognition, body gesture recognition, motion history image, histogram of oriented gradients, time normalization, bag-of-words, appearance features, temporal dynamics, video-based emotion recognition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review