Cited by 52Emotion and Mood RecognitionFace recognition and analysisGaze Tracking and Assistive Technology

Automatic measurement of ad preferences from facial responses gathered over the Internet

McDuff, Daniel, El Kaliouby, Rana, Senechal, Thibaud, Demirdjian, David, Picard, Rosalind·2014·Image and Vision Computing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.imavis.2014.01.004

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Methods for recognizing other affective states have been proposed, namely cognitive states like boredom, confusion, delight, concentration and frustration, positive and negative affect from groups of people, or liking/not-liking of online media for predicting buying behaviour for marketing purposes.

    “Methods for recognizing other affective states have also been proposed, namely cognitive states like boredom, confusion, delight, concentration and frustration [266], positive and negative affect from groups of people [267] or liking/not-linking of online media for predicting buying behaviour for marketing purposes [268].”
  • Most approaches target primitive facial expressions of affect, but others recognize cognitive states, positive and negative affect from groups of people, and liking/not-liking of online media for predicting buying behaviour for marketing purposes.

    “Most approaches target primitive FEs of affect, but others recognize cognitive states [266], postive and negative affect from groups of people [267] and liking/not-linking of online media for predicting buying behaviour for marketing purposes [268].”
  • In naturalistic environments, most approaches target primitive facial expressions of affect, but methods for recognizing cognitive states, positive and negative affect from groups of people, or liking/not-liking of online media for predicting buying behaviour for marketing purposes are also common.

    “In naturalistic environments, most approaches target primitive FEs of affect. Methods for recognizing cognitive states [266], positive and negative affect from groups of people [267] or liking/not-linking of online media for predicting buying behaviour for marketing purposes [268] are also common.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McDuff, D., El Kaliouby, R., Senechal, T., Demirdjian, D., & Picard, R.
Affiliations
  • MIT Media Lab (US)
  • MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
  • McDuff, Daniel
  • Demirdjian, David
  • Picard, Rosalind
Venue
Image and Vision Computing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-10
Volume
32
Issue
10
Pages
630-640
ISSN
0262-8856 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2047967129
Cited by
52
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3
FWCI
11.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Image and Vision Computing (publishedVersion)
Funders
Media Lab Consortium
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
Keywords
online video advertising, ad liking, facial expression analysis, smile detection, advertising effectiveness, copy testing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review