Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 403

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 120 of the 120 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

TLR2 – promiscuous or specific? A critical re-evaluation of a receptor expressing apparent broad specificity

Open access
Zähringer, Ulrich, Lindner, Buko, Inamura, Seiichi, Heine, Holger, Alexander, Christian·2008·Immunobiology

Abstract

Of all pattern recognition receptors (PRR) in innate immunity, Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) recognizes the structurally broadest range of different bacterial compounds known as pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs). TLR2 agonists identified so far are lipopolysaccharides (LPSs) from different bacterial strains, lipoproteins, (synthetic) lipopeptides, lipoarabinomannans, lipomannans, glycosylphosphatidylinositol, lipoteichoic acids (LTA), various proteins including lipoproteins and glycoproteins, zymosan, and peptidoglycan (PG). Because these molecules are structurally diverse, it seems unlikely that TLR2 has the capability to react with all agonists to the same degree. The aim of this review is to identify and describe well-defined structure-function relationships for TLR2. Because of its biomedical importance and because its genetics and biochemistry are presently most completely known among all Gram-positive bacteria, we have chosen Staphylococcus aureus as a focus. Our data together with those reported by other groups reveal that only lipoproteins/lipopeptides are sensed at physiologically concentrations by TLR2 at picomolar levels. This finding implies that the activity of all other putative bacterial compounds so far reported as TLR2 agonists was most likely due to contaminating highly active natural lipoproteins and/or lipopeptides.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.imbio.2008.02.005

Cites

120 of 120 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 120 references

Cited by

See all 403

Metadata

Authors
Zähringer, U., Lindner, B., Inamura, S., Heine, H., & Alexander, C.
Venue
Immunobiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-05
Volume
213
Issue
3-4
Pages
205-224
ISSN
0171-2985 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2041168913
Cited by
403
References
120
FWCI
13.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: TLR2 – promiscuous or specific? A critical re-evaluation of a receptor expressing apparent broad specificity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.imbio.2008.02.005
The paper
Zähringer, U., Lindner, B., Inamura, S., Heine, H., & Alexander, C. (2008). TLR2 – promiscuous or specific? A critical re-evaluation of a receptor expressing apparent broad specificity. Immunobiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imbio.2008.02.005

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.