Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 253

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

T Cell Receptor Signaling Is Limited by Docking Geometry to Peptide-Major Histocompatibility Complex

Open access
Adams, Jarrett J., Narayanan, Samanthi, Liu, Baoyu, Birnbaum, Michael E., Kruse, Andrew C., Bowerman, Natalie A., Chen, Wei, Levin, Aron M., Connolly, Janet M., Zhu, Cheng, Kranz, David M., Garcia, K. Christopher·2011·Immunity

Abstract

T cell receptor (TCR) engagement of peptide-major histocompatibility complex (MHC) is essential to adaptive immunity, but it is unknown if TCR signaling responses are influenced by the binding topology of the TCR-peptide-MHC complex. We developed yeast-displayed peptide-MHC libraries that enabled us to identify new peptide sequences reactive with a single TCR. Structural analysis showed that four peptides bound to the TCR with distinct 3-dimensional (3D) and 2D affinities, using entirely different binding chemistries. Three of the peptides that shared a common docking mode, where key TCR-MHC germline interactions are preserved, induced TCR signaling. The fourth peptide failed to induce signaling, and was recognized in a substantially different TCR-MHC binding mode that apparently exceeded geometric tolerances compatible with signaling. We suggest that the ‘stereotypical’ TCR-MHC docking paradigm evolved from productive signaling geometries, and that TCR signaling can be modulated by peptides that are recognized in alternative TCR-pMHC binding orientations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.09.013

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Adams, J. J., Narayanan, S., Liu, B., Birnbaum, M. E., Kruse, A. C., Bowerman, N. A., Chen, W., Levin, A. M., Connolly, J. M., Zhu, C., Kranz, D. M., & Garcia, K. C.
Venue
Immunity
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-11
Volume
35
Issue
5
Pages
681-693
ISSN
1074-7613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2038509173
Cited by
253
References
0
FWCI
9.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.