Deep learning-based real time detection for cardiac objects with fetal ultrasound video
Open accessAbstract
Fetal cardiac anatomical structure interpretation by ultrasound (US) is a key part of prenatal assessment. Unfortunately, the numerous speckles in US video, the small size of fetal cardiac structures, and unfixed fetal positions make manual detection processes difficult. To alleviate such problems, a deep learning model was developed to fully automate the processing of fetal echocardiographs with 2-dimensional cross-sectional images. The weakness of such an approach is that a physician immediately interprets US video with 3-dimensional objects to diagnose patients in clinical practice. To improve fetal cardiac anatomical structure interpretation via US for accurate and real time diagnosis, this paper proposes a real-time fetal cardiac substructure detection using US video with the You Only Look Once (YOLO) framework. In YOLO, an end-to-end neural network makes predictions for cardiac substructure objects, boxes, and class probabilities simultaneously. To achieve reliable performance, 40 fetal echocardiography videos were trained with the new YOLOv7 architecture and fine-tuned to work optimally and run efficiently. We conducted with nine fetal cardiac substructure objects such as the left atrium, right atrium, left ventricle, right ventricle, tricuspid valve, pulmonary valve, mitral valve, aortic valve, and aorta. The results yielded the highest mean average precision of 82.10%, reaching 17 frames per second (FPS) for nine cardiac substructure objects in 0.3 ms. The main finding of our study is that with even a limited number of US videos, YOLOv7 can detect fetal cardiac substructure objects in real-time. Such a network can work efficiently to detect small fetal cardiac objects automatically in a rapid phase with the help of proper fine-tuning. This work mainly assists medical experts in the fetal cardiac anatomy diagnostic process.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
YOLO v7 achieved mAP of 82.10% for 3D image analysis using a unique 2D to 3D bounding box adaptation method using NMS.
“| YOLO v7 [66] | mAP | Proposed a unique 2D to 3D bounding box adaptation method using NMSfor 3D image analysis. Achieved mAP of 82.10%. | Ultrasound Videos |”
From The YOLO Framework: A Comprehensive Review of Evolution, Applications, and Benchmarks in Object Detection (2024) · cites this paper as [66]
Cites
YOLOv7: Trainable bag-of-freebies sets new state-of-the-art for real-time object detectors
Wang, C.-Y., Bochkovskiy, A., & Liao, H.-Y. M. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2207.02696 · Cited by 13,205 · see citing works
YOLOv7: Trainable Bag-of-Freebies Sets New State-of-the-Art for Real-Time Object Detectors
Wang, C.-Y., Bochkovskiy, A., & Liao, H.-Y. M. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.00721 · Cited by 13,198 · see citing works
Zhang, J., Gajjala, S., Agrawal, P., Tison, G. H., Hallock, L. A., Beussink-Nelson, L., Lassen, M. H., Fan, E., Aras, M. A., Jordan, C., et al. (2018) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.118.034338 · Cited by 1,006 · see citing works
SonoNet: Real-Time Detection and Localisation of Fetal Standard Scan Planes in Freehand Ultrasound
Baumgartner, C. F., Kamnitsas, K., Matthew, J., Fletcher, T. P., Smith, S., Koch, L. M., Kainz, B., & Rueckert, D. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2017.2712367 · Cited by 416 · see citing works
Xu, L., Liu, M., Shen, Z., Wang, H., Liu, X., Wang, X., Wang, S., Li, T., Yu, S., Hou, M., et al. (2020) · Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics · doi:10.1016/j.compmedimag.2019.101690 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Nurmaini, S., Rachmatullah, M. N., Sapitri, A. I., Darmawahyuni, A., Tutuko, B., Firdaus, F., Partan, R. U., & Bernolian, N. (2021) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s21238007 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ali, M. L., & Zhang, Z. (2024) · Computers · doi:10.3390/computers13120336 · Cited by 383 · see citing works
- Authors
- Iriani Sapitri, A., Nurmaini, S., Naufal Rachmatullah, M., Tutuko, B., Darmawahyuni, A., Firdaus, F., Rini, D. P., & Islami, A.
- Affiliations
- Sriwijaya University (ID)
- Corresponding author
- Nurmaini, Siti
- ORCID
- Venue
- Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023
- Volume
- 36
- Pages
- 101150
- ISSN
- 2352-9148 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4311907047
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13
- FWCI
- 3.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Informatics in Medicine Unlocked (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Universitas Sriwijaya
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Keywords
- fetal echocardiography, real-time object detection, YOLOv7, ultrasound video, cardiac anatomy, left atrium, right atrium, left ventricle, right ventricle, heart valves, aorta, fine-tuning, prenatal diagnosis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review