Pistacia lentiscus leaves as a source of phenolic compounds: microwave-assisted extraction optimized and compared with ultrasound-assisted and conventional solvent extraction
Abstract
Microwave assisted extraction (MAE) was investigated for extraction of total phenolic compounds (TPC expressed as gallic acid equivalents GAE) from the leaves of Pistacia lentiscus L. with maximized total phenolic yield using response surface methodology (RSM) coupled with a Box–Behnken design. The optimal MAE processing parameters were 46% ethanol, extraction time 60s, potency density 17.86W/mL, and liquid/solid ratio 28:1, with an extraction yield of 185.69±18.35mgGAE/gdw. The optimized MAE was compared with another emerging technology (ultrasound assisted extraction, UAE) and with conventional solvent extraction (CSE) giving higher extraction yields of TPC, total flavonoids and tannins and comparable antioxidant capacity (according to the radical ABTS assay).
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The BBD requires a smaller number of trials and provides reliable information in a shorter operation time.
“the BBD was applied because it requires a smaller number of trials and provides reliable information in a shorter operation time [8].”
From Optimized microwave-assisted azadirachtin extraction using response surface methodology (2024) · cites this paper as [8]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Alara, O. R., Abdurahman, N. H., Ukaegbu, C. I., & Azhari, N. H. (2018) · Industrial Crops and Products · doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.06.034 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Kala, H. K., Mehta, R., Sen, K. K., Tandey, R., & Mandal, V. (2016) · TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.trac.2016.09.007 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Optimized microwave-assisted azadirachtin extraction using response surface methodology
Martínez-Castro, R., Flórez-Santiago, J., Valle-Molinares, R., Cabrera-Barraza, J., & Espitia-Almeida, F. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31504 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
“In this study, the BBD was applied because it requires a smaller number of trials and provides reliable information in a shorter operation time [8].”
BackgroundMethod
- Authors
- Dahmoune, F., Spigno, G., Moussi, K., Remini, H., Cherbal, A., & Madani, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Béjaïa (DZ)
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT)
- University of Jijel (DZ)
- Corresponding author
- Spigno, Giorgia
- Venue
- Industrial Crops and Products
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-11
- Volume
- 61
- Pages
- 31-40
- ISSN
- 0926-6690 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1983438144
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 9.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Industrial Crops and Products (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural and Biological Research
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Edible Oils Quality and Analysis
- Keywords
- Pistacia lentiscus, phenolic compounds, microwave-assisted extraction, ultrasound-assisted extraction, extraction optimization, total phenolic content, total flavonoid content, tannins, antioxidant capacity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
