Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 285

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Phenolic profile and antioxidant activity of Coleostephus myconis (L.) Rchb.f.: An underexploited and highly disseminated species

Open access
Bessada, Sílvia M.F., Barreira, João C.M., Barros, Lillian, Ferreira, Isabel C.F.R., Oliveira, M. Beatriz P.P.·2016·Industrial Crops and Products

Abstract

Abstract Coleostephus myconis (L.) Rchb.f. (Asteraceae) is a species with ruderal growth and persistence in abandoned soils, being characterized for its plentiful yellow flowering between March and August. Despite its botanical relevance, C. myconis had never been studied neither for its antioxidant activity, nor individual phenolic compounds. Herein, the antioxidant activity of different botanical parts: stems and leaves (green parts), floral buds, flowers in anthesis and senescent flowers, was studied in selected extracts (ethanol, ethanol:water 1:1 and water) through different chemical and biochemical assays. In addition, the phenolic profiles of the hydroethanolic extracts of each botanical part were also characterized by liquid chromatography with diode array detection and electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (LC-DAD-ESI/MSn). The antioxidant activity was significantly modulated by the extract type, with the hydroethanolic extracts showing the highest antioxidant activity, especially those obtained from the senescent flowers and floral buds. The phenolic profiles were the same for all flowering stages (with quantitative differences), but that characterized in the green parts were quite different. Floral buds gave the highest contents in phenolic compounds, mainly due to the contribution of 3,5-O-dicaffeoylquinic acid and myricetin-O-methyl-hexoside. Overall, C. myconis showed an interesting potential to be included in different industrial applications.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.04.065

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 12 references

Cited by

See all 285

Metadata

Authors
Bessada, S. M. F., Barreira, J. C. M., Barros, L., Ferreira, I. C. F. R., & Oliveira, M. B. P. P.
Venue
Industrial Crops and Products
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-10
Volume
89
Pages
45-51
ISSN
0926-6690 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2389720223
Cited by
285
References
12
FWCI
20.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phenolic profile and antioxidant activity of Coleostephus myconis (L.) Rchb.f.: An underexploited and highly disseminated species. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.04.065
The paper
Bessada, S. M. F., Barreira, J. C. M., Barros, L., Ferreira, I. C. F. R., & Oliveira, M. B. P. P. (2016). Phenolic profile and antioxidant activity of Coleostephus myconis (L.) Rchb.f.: An underexploited and highly disseminated species. Industrial Crops and Products. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.04.065

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.