Cited by 15Ginkgo biloba and Cashew ApplicationsPhytochemistry and Biological ActivitiesTraditional Chinese Medicine Analysis

Ginkgo biloba endopleura: An unexplored industrial waste as a potential source of flavonoids, lipids and anti-lung cancer compounds

Liu, Yanxia, Xin, Huawei, Li, Wenli, Shen, Na, Cui, Yulei·2022·Industrial Crops and Products

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.115851

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 46 · Cited by 15

Authors
Liu, Y., Xin, H., Li, W., Shen, N., & Cui, Y.
Affiliations
Linyi University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Shen, Na
  • Cui, Yulei
Venue
Industrial Crops and Products
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-12
Volume
189
Pages
115851
ISSN
0926-6690 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4307957019
Cited by
15
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6
FWCI
2.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Industrial Crops and Products (publishedVersion)
Funders
Linyi University (LYDX2019BS055)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Ginkgo biloba and Cashew Applications
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Phytochemistry and Biological Activities
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Traditional Chinese Medicine Analysis
Keywords
ginkgo nuts, agro-industrial waste valorization, flavonoids, lipids, phytochemical profiling, ginkgetin, linoleic acid, quercetin, naringenin chalcone, hydroxy fatty acids, network pharmacology, molecular docking, functional food ingredients

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review