Flipping the odds of AI-driven open innovation: The effectiveness of partner trustworthiness in counteracting interorganizational knowledge hiding
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
AI adoption favors context-based knowledge sharing.
“AI adoption favors context-based knowledge sharing .”
From Artificial intelligence in innovation management: A review of innovation capabilities and a taxonomy of <scp>AI</scp> applications (2025) · cites this paper as Arias-Pérez and Huynh (2023)
The retrieved passages are bibliographic information and keywords, including “knowledge hiding” and “artificial intelligence capability”; they do not state a finding about knowledge sharing. Searches for “context-based knowledge sharing” and related paraphrases returned no passage addressing whether AI adoption favors it. (LLM, conf=0.68)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Wamba-Taguimdje, S.-L., Fosso Wamba, S., Kala Kamdjoug, J. R., & Tchatchouang Wanko, C. E. (2020) · Business Process Management Journal · doi:10.1108/bpmj-10-2019-0411 · Cited by 1,280 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence and Business Value: a Literature Review
Enholm, I. M., Papagiannidis, E., Mikalef, P., & Krogstie, J. (2022) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-021-10186-w · Cited by 1,046 · see citing works
Braganza, A., Chen, W., Canhoto, A., & Sap, S. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.018 · Cited by 431 · see citing works
Kinkel, S., Baumgartner, M., & Cherubini, E. (2022) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102375 · Cited by 316 · see citing works
Abbass, H. A. (2019) · Cognitive Computation · doi:10.1007/s12559-018-9619-0 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gama, F., & Magistretti, S. (2025) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12698 · Cited by 388 · see citing works
Rezaei, M., Pironti, M., & Quaglia, R. (2025) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-10-2023-2023 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
- Authors
- Arias-Pérez, J., & Huynh, T.
- Affiliations
- Universidad de Antioquia (CO)
- Coventry University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Arias-Pérez, José
- Venue
- Industrial Marketing Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-05
- Volume
- 111
- Pages
- 30-40
- ISSN
- 0019-8501 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4361027406
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 25.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- Locations
- Industrial Marketing Management (publishedVersion)
- Pure (Coventry University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Universidad de Antioquia (2022-47671)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Knowledge Management and Sharing
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategy and Innovation
- Keywords
- open innovation, AI capabilities, benevolence, integrity, outbound open innovation, inbound open innovation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
