Cited by 77Infant Development and Preterm CareAttachment and Relationship DynamicsInfant Health and Development

Are parenting interventions effective in improving the relationship between mothers and their preterm infants?

Evans, Tracey, Whittingham, Koa, Sanders, Matthew, Colditz, Paul, Boyd, Roslyn N.·2014·Infant Behavior and Development

Abstract

Aim To systematically review the efficacy of parenting interventions in improving the quality of the relationship between mothers and preterm infants. Method Randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials (RCT) of parenting interventions for mothers of preterm infants where mother-infant relationship quality outcomes were reported. Databases searched: The Cochrane Library, PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Web of Science. Results Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria, 14 with strong methodological quality. Eight parenting interventions were found to improve the quality of the mother-preterm infant relationship. Conclusions Heterogeneity of the interventions calls for an integrated new parenting program focusing on cue-based, responsive care from the mother to her preterm infant to improve the quality of the relationship for these mother-preterm infant dyads.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.infbeh.2013.12.009

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The medical condition of preterm infants can limit close physical contact between mother and baby, increasing risk for attachment difficulties, altered infant development, and maternal anxiety and depression.

    “The medical condition of preterm infants can limit close physical contact between mother and baby, increasing the risk for attachment difficulties, altered infant development, and maternal anxiety and depression (7).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Evans, T., Whittingham, K., Sanders, M., Colditz, P., & Boyd, R. N.
Affiliations
The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Evans, Tracey
Venue
Infant Behavior and Development
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-05
Volume
37
Issue
2
Pages
131-154
ISSN
0163-6383 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2100594949
Cited by
77
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1
FWCI
7.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Infant Behavior and Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Infant Health and Development
Keywords
parenting support, mother-infant relationship, preterm infants, responsive caregiving, intervention efficacy, mother-infant dyads
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Premature, Mother-Child Relations, Mothers, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Parenting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review