Cited by 20Language Development and DisordersDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyHearing Impairment and Communication

Screening language skills at 2;0

Open access
Vehkavuori, Suvi-Maria, Stolt, Suvi·2018·Infant Behavior and Development

Abstract

Early screening of children at risk for language difficulties is challenging. This study aimed to analyze the specificity and sensitivity of two screening methods at 2;0 years of age. In addition, the matter of what kind of information the use of word combinations and parental concern provide for screening was analyzed. The subjects were 78 children. The screening methods used were the Finnish versions of the short-form version of the MacArthur Communicative Development Inventories (FinCDI-SF) and the Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scales, Developmental Profile, Infant-Toddler Checklist (FinCSBS). The specificity and sensitivity of the screening methods were analyzed based on result of the Reynell Developmental Language Scales III. Both screening methods had high specificity but only moderate sensitivity. The use of word combinations and parental concern provided relevant information on early language development. The results imply that it is important to take into consideration receptive language development in early screening.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.infbeh.2018.01.001

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vehkavuori, S.-M., & Stolt, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Oulu (FI)
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
Corresponding author
Vehkavuori, Suvi-Maria
Venue
Infant Behavior and Development
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-02
Volume
50
Pages
174-179
ISSN
0163-6383 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2789541915
Cited by
20
References
26
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3
FWCI
4.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Infant Behavior and Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Hearing Impairment and Communication
Keywords
language screening, toddlers, language delay, MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory, sensitivity and specificity, receptive language development, parental concerns, word combinations, early childhood language development
MeSH terms
Child Development, Child Language, Child, Preschool, Communication, Female, Finland, Humans, Language Development, Male, Parents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review