The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Consistency and consensus measures for linguistic preference relations based on distribution assessments
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words
Martinez, L., & Herrera, F. (2000) · IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.1109/91.890332 · Cited by 2,662
Cited by
Probabilistic linguistic term sets in multi-attribute group decision making
Pang, Q., Wang, H., & Xu, Z. (2016) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2016.06.021 · Cited by 1,289
Zhang, H., Zhao, S., Kou, G., Li, C.-C., Dong, Y., & Herrera, F. (2020) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2020.03.001 · Cited by 355
Self-citationZhang, H., Dong, Y., Chiclana, F., & Yu, S. (2019) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2018.11.052 · Cited by 339
Self-citationPossibility Distribution-Based Approach for MAGDM With Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Information
Wu, Z., & Xu, J. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2015.2413894 · Cited by 314
Ding, R.-X., Palomares, I., Wang, X., Yang, G.-R., Liu, B., Dong, Y., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2020) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2020.01.006 · Cited by 301
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, G., Dong, Y., & Xu, Y.
- Venue
- Information Fusion
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-05
- Volume
- 17
- Pages
- 46-55
- ISSN
- 1566-2535 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2027218152
- Cited by
- 590
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consistency and consensus measures for linguistic preference relations based on distribution assessments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.inffus.2012.01.006
- The paper
- Zhang, G., Dong, Y., & Xu, Y. (2014). Consistency and consensus measures for linguistic preference relations based on distribution assessments. Information Fusion. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2012.01.006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
