Cited by 57Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsVideo Surveillance and Tracking MethodsAdvanced Image Fusion Techniques

A binocular image fusion approach for minimizing false positives in handgun detection with deep learning

Olmos, Roberto, Tabik, Siham, Lamas, Alberto, Pérez-Hernández, Francisco, Herrera, Francisco·2019·Information Fusion

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.inffus.2018.11.015

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In [127], with a dataset of 124 images, accuracy rate was 80.62%.

    “while with a dataset of 124 images, the accuracy rate stood only at 80.62%”

    From A Survey of Video Surveillance Systems in Smart City (2023) · cites this paper as [127]

  • In [127], as the number of images in the dataset increases, accuracy rate rises.

    “In implementation, as the number of images within the dataset increases, there is a corresponding rise in the accuracy rate.”

    From A Survey of Video Surveillance Systems in Smart City (2023) · cites this paper as [127]

  • The composite image from [127] provides three-dimensional information about objects, which can help reduce false positives during classification.

    “This composite image provides three-dimensional information about objects within the scene, which can help to reduce the occurrence of false positives during classification.”

    From A Survey of Video Surveillance Systems in Smart City (2023) · cites this paper as [127]

  • In [127], expanding dataset to 332 images improved accuracy to 87.93%.

    “the accuracy rate notably improved, reaching 87.93% upon expanding the dataset to 332 images.”

    From A Survey of Video Surveillance Systems in Smart City (2023) · cites this paper as [127]

  • The approach in [127] fuses binocular images from multiple viewpoints to create a comprehensive representation of a scene.

    “The approach presented in [127] involves fusing binocular images captured from multiple viewpoints to create a comprehensive and informative representation of a scene.”

    From A Survey of Video Surveillance Systems in Smart City (2023) · cites this paper as [127]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Olmos, R., Tabik, S., Lamas, A., Pérez-Hernández, F., & Herrera, F.
Affiliations
Universidad de Granada (ES)
Corresponding author
Tabik, Siham
Venue
Information Fusion
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-09
Volume
49
Pages
271-280
ISSN
1566-2535 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2902261126
Cited by
57
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4
FWCI
2.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Information Fusion (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnologia (TIN2017-89517-P)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Advanced Image Fusion Techniques
Keywords
handgun detection, false positive reduction, dual-camera system, surveillance video, object detection, candidate region selection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review