Cited by 7Fault Detection and Control SystemsAdvanced Graph Neural NetworksExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)

Explainable knowledge graph embeddings for industrial process monitoring & control

Open access
Weyns, Michael, Blyau, Thibault, Steenwinckel, Bram, De Turck, Filip, Van Hoecke, Sofie, Ongenae, Femke·2025·Information Fusion

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.inffus.2025.103242

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weyns, M., Blyau, T., Steenwinckel, B., De Turck, F., Van Hoecke, S., & Ongenae, F.
Affiliations
Ghent University (BE)
Corresponding author
Weyns, Michael
Venue
Information Fusion
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-11
Volume
123
Pages
103242
ISSN
1566-2535 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4410012187
Cited by
7
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2
FWCI
2.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Information Fusion (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Research Foundation Flanders (1SD8821N, 1SH2C24N)
  • Agentschap Innoveren en Ondernemen
  • Vlaamse regering (HBC.2021.0671)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Fault Detection and Control Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Keywords
knowledge graph embedding, explainable AI, industrial process monitoring, process control, hybrid AI, SHAP, chemical engineering, interpretability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review