Cited by 132Software Engineering Techniques and PracticesAdvanced Software Engineering MethodologiesSafety Systems Engineering in Autonomy

Requirements engineering for artificial intelligence systems: A systematic mapping study

Open access
Ahmad, Khlood, Abdelrazek, Mohamed, Arora, Chetan, Bano, Muneera, Grundy, John·2023·Information and Software Technology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.infsof.2023.107176

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ahmad, K., Abdelrazek, M., Arora, C., Bano, M., & Grundy, J.
Affiliations
  • Deakin University (AU)
  • Monash University (AU)
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
Corresponding author
Ahmad, Khlood
Venue
Information and Software Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-06
Volume
158
Pages
107176
ISSN
0950-5849 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4321793865
Cited by
132
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 18
FWCI
30.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Information and Software Technology (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
Australian Research Council (FL190100035)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy
Keywords
requirements modeling, requirements engineering tools, autonomous vehicles, data requirements, AI ethics, trust in AI, explainability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review