Cited by 220Software Engineering Techniques and PracticesSoftware Engineering ResearchAdvanced Software Engineering Methodologies

A Taxonomy of Software Engineering Challenges for Machine Learning Systems: An Empirical Investigation

Open access
Lwakatare, Lucy Ellen, Raj, Aiswarya, Bosch, Jan, Olsson, Helena Holmström, Crnkovic, Ivica·2019·Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing

Abstract

Artificial intelligence enabled systems have been an inevitable part of everyday life. However, efficient software engineering principles and processes need to be considered and extended when developing AI- enabled systems. The objective of this study is to identify and classify software engineering challenges that are faced by different companies when developing software-intensive systems that incorporate machine learning components. Using case study approach, we explored the development of machine learning systems from six different companies across various domains and identified main software engineering challenges. The challenges are mapped into a proposed taxonomy that depicts the evolution of use of ML components in software-intensive system in industrial settings. Our study provides insights to software engineering community and research to guide discussions and future research into applied machine learning.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-030-19034-7_14

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Serving-related challenges are some of the ones most often reported in the literature, usually from a performance perspective.

    “Serving-related challenges are some of the ones most often reported in the literature [5-7, 9, 11, 12, 16, 20, 28, 34, 44, 53, 54], usually from a performance perspective.”
  • Achieving a low inference latency and high throughput is widely reported as a challenge in serving ML models.

    “Achieving a low inference latency and high throughput is widely reported as a challenge in serving ML models [6,7,12,28,34].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Lefortier, D., Truchet, A., de Rijke, M.: Sources of variability in large-scale machine learning systems. In: Machine Learning Systems (NIPS 2015 Workshop) (2015)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lwakatare, L. E., Raj, A., Bosch, J., Olsson, H. H., & Crnkovic, I.
Affiliations
  • Chalmers University of Technology (SE)
  • Malmö University (SE)
Corresponding author
Lwakatare, Lucy Ellen
Venue
Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing
Published
2019
Pages
227-243
ISSN
  • 1865-1348 (ISSN-L)
  • 1865-1356
OpenAlex
W2944264045
Cited by
214
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
25.09
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Lecture notes in business information processing (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Malmö University Publications (Malmö University) (submittedVersion)
  • Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
Keywords
software engineering challenges, machine learning systems, artificial intelligence systems, software-intensive systems, industrial software development, applied machine learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review