Cited by 59Advanced Software Engineering MethodologiesGreen IT and SustainabilitySoftware Engineering Techniques and Practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 151 of the 158 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sustainable software engineering: Reflections on advances in research and practice

Open access

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.infsof.2023.107316

Cites

151 of 151 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • By adopting sustainable software design principles, software developers can create applications that are more energy-efficient, resilient, and environmentally friendly.

    “By adopting sustainable software design principles, software developers can create applications that are more energyefficient, resilient, and environmentally friendly.”
  • Sustainable software operations in cyberphysical spaces require new design, development, deployment, and maintenance approaches that minimize the ecological footprint, improve resource efficiency, and promote social responsibility.

    “Sustainable software operations in cyberphysical spaces require new design, development, deployment, and maintenance approaches that minimize the ecological footprint, improve resource efficiency, and promote social responsibility [204].”

    From A 2030 Roadmap for Software Engineering (2025) · cites this paper as [204]

  • Venters et al.'s review of 234 studies offers a foundation and a road map of emerging research themes in sustainable software engineering, with an emphasis on the assessment and identification of suitable KPIs.

    “Venters et al.'s [204] review of 234 studies offers a foundation and a road map of emerging research themes in the area of sustainable software engineering, with an emphasis on the assessment and identification of suitable KPIs.”

    From A 2030 Roadmap for Software Engineering (2025) · cites this paper as [204]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

7 of the 158 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. W.W. Royce, Managing the Development of Large Software Systems: Concepts and Techniques, in: I9th International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE, 1987, pp. 328–388.
  2. . NATO, IEEE Computer Society Press, 1968.
  3. M. Shaw, Progress Toward an Engineering Discipline of Software, in: 38th International Conference on Software Engineering Companion, ICSE-C, 2016, pp. 3–4.
  4. ISO/IEC/IEEE, 2017
  5. I. Jacobson, 50 years of SE, so now what?, in: 40th International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE, 2018.
  6. S. Oyedeji, A. Seffah, B. Penzenstadler, Classifying the measures of software sustainability according to the current perceptions, in: 4th International Workshop on Measurement and Metrics for Green and Sustainable Software Systems (MeGSuS) @ Empirical Software Engineering International Week, ESEIW 2018, 2018, p. 19.
  7. S. Betz, C. Becker, R. Chitchyan, L. Duboc, S. Easterbrook, B. Penzenstadler, N. Seyff, C. Venters, Sustainability Debt: A Metaphor to Support Sustainability Design Decisions, in: 4th International Workshop on Requirements Engineering for Sustainable Systems @ 23rd IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, RE, 2015, pp. 55–63.
  8. D.M. Le, C. Carrillo, R. Capilla, N. Medvidovic, Relating Architectural Decay and Sustainability of Software Systems, in: 13th Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture, WICSA, 2016, pp. 178–181.
  9. R. Hintemann, S. Hinterholzer, Energy Consumption of Data Centers Worldwide - How will the Internet become Green?, in: 6th International Conference on ICT for Sustainability, ICT4S, 2382, 2019, pp. 1–8.
  10. Wilson, 2014, Software carpentry: lessons learned [version 2; peer review: 3 approved], F1000Research, 3
  11. Sufi, 2018, Raising the status of software in research: A survey-based evaluation of the software sustainability institute fellowship programme [version 1; peer review: 3 approved with reservations], F1000Research, 7
  12. Dwivedi, 2023, “So what if chatgpt wrote it?” multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational ai for research, practice and policy, Int. J. Inf. Manag., 71
  13. L. Northrop, Modern trends through an architecture lens, in: 40th International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE, 2018.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Venters, C. C., Capilla, R., Nakagawa, E. Y., Betz, S., Penzenstadler, B., Crick, T., & Brooks, I.
Affiliations
  • University of Huddersfield (GB)
  • Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (ES)
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
  • Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology (FI)
  • Swansea University (GB)
  • University of the West of England (GB)
Corresponding author
Venters, Colin C.
Venue
Information and Software Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-12
Volume
164
Pages
107316
ISSN
0950-5849 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4385753058
Cited by
59
References
158
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 1
FWCI
5.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Information and Software Technology (publishedVersion)
  • Huddersfield Research Portal (University of Huddersfield) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • Repository of Futwangen University of Applied Sciences (Furtwangen University) (submittedVersion)
  • Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (2015/24144-7)
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (313245/2021-5)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Green IT and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
Keywords
sustainable software development, software sustainability, software architecture, reference architecture, sustainability indicators, sustainability education, software-intensive systems, research roadmap

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review