The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Why children are not vaccinated: a review of the grey literature
Abstract
In collaboration with WHO, IMMUNIZATION basics analyzed 126 documents from the global grey literature to identify reasons why eligible children had incomplete or no vaccinations. The main reasons for under-vaccination were related to immunization services and to parental knowledge and attitudes. The most frequently cited factors were: access to services, health staff attitudes and practices, reliability of services, false contraindications, parents' practical knowledge of vaccination, fear of side effects, conflicting priorities and parental beliefs. Some family demographic characteristics were strong, but underlying, risk factors for under-vaccination. Studies must be well designed to capture a complete picture of the simultaneous causes of under-vaccination and to avoid biased results. Although the grey literature contains studies of varying quality, it includes many well-designed studies. Every immunization program should strive to provide quality services that are accessible, convenient, reliable, friendly, affordable and acceptable, and should solicit feedback from families and community leaders. Every program should monitor missed and under-vaccinated children and assess and address the causes. Although global reviews, such as this one, can play a useful role in identifying key questions for local study, local enquiry and follow-up remain essential.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rainey, J. J., Watkins, M., Ryman, T. K., Sandhu, P., Bo, A., & Banerjee, K. (2011) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.08.096 · Cited by 426
Self-citationExpanded Programme on Immunization
(2001) · Immunization · doi:10.1002/9780470693841.ch8 · Cited by 392
Immunization in Developing Countries
Cherian, T., Cutts, F. T., Eggers, R., Lydon, P., Sodha, S. V., & Okwo‐Bele, J. (2017) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-35761-6.00076-6 · Cited by 36
Immunization in developing countries
Mitchell, V., DIETZ, V. J., Okwo‐Bele, J., & Cutts, F. T. (2013) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4557-0090-5.00070-7 · Cited by 17
The social dynamics of infant immunisation in Africa : perspectives from the Republic of Guinea
Millimouno, D., Diallo, A. A., Fairhead, J. R., & Leach, M. (2006) · OpenDocs (Institute of Development Studies) · Cited by 9
Cited by
Vaccine hesitancy, vaccine refusal and the anti-vaccine movement: influence, impact and implications
Dubé, E., Vivion, M., & MacDonald, N. E. (2015) · Expert Review of Vaccines · doi:10.1586/14760584.2015.964212 · Cited by 986
Garousi, V., Felderer, M., & Mäntylä, M. V. (2019) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2018.09.006 · Cited by 831
Feletto, M., & Sharkey, A. (2019) · BMJ Global Health · doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001711 · Cited by 63
Impact of vaccine stockouts on immunization coverage in Nigeria
Gooding, E., Spiliotopoulou, E., & Yadav, P. (2019) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.06.006 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Favin, M., Steinglass, R., Fields, R., Banerjee, K., & Sawhney, M.
- Venue
- International Health
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-12
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 229-238
- ISSN
- 1876-3405 (ISSN-L)
- 1876-3413
- OpenAlex
- W2148364666
- Cited by
- 344
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 10.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why children are not vaccinated: a review of the grey literature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.inhe.2012.07.004
- The paper
- Favin, M., Steinglass, R., Fields, R., Banerjee, K., & Sawhney, M. (2012). Why children are not vaccinated: a review of the grey literature. International Health. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inhe.2012.07.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.