CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 263Trauma and Emergency Care StudiesTrauma Management and DiagnosisTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Defining major trauma using the 2008 Abbreviated Injury Scale

Palmer, Cameron S, Gabbe, Belinda J, Cameron, Peter A·2016·Injury
DOI 10.1016/j.injury.2015.07.003
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Background The Injury Severity Score (ISS) is the most ubiquitous summary score derived from Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) data. It is frequently used to classify patients as 'major trauma' using a threshold of ISS >15. However, it is not known whether this is still appropriate, given the changes which have been made to the AIS codeset since this threshold was first used. This study aimed to identify appropriate ISS and New Injury Severity Score (NISS) thresholds for use with the 2008 AIS (AIS08) which predict mortality and in-hospital resource use comparably to ISS >15 using AIS98.Methods Data from 37,760 patients in a state trauma registry were retrieved and reviewed. AIS data coded using the 1998 AIS (AIS98) were mapped to AIS08. ISS and NISS were calculated, and their effects on patient classification compared. The ability of selected ISS and NISS thresholds to predict mortality or high-level in-hospital resource use (the need for ICU or urgent surgery) was assessed.Results An ISS >12 using AIS08 was similar to an ISS >15 using AIS98 in terms of both the number of patients classified major trauma, and overall major trauma mortality. A 10% mortality level was only seen for ISS 25 or greater. A NISS >15 performed similarly to both of these ISS thresholds. However, the AIS08-based ISS >12 threshold correctly classified significantly more patients than a NISS >15 threshold for all three severity measures assessed.Conclusions When coding injuries using AIS08, an ISS >12 appears to function similarly to an ISS >15 in AIS98 for the purposes of identifying a population with an elevated risk of death after injury. Where mortality is a primary outcome of trauma monitoring, an ISS >12 threshold could be adopted to identify major trauma patients.Level of evidence Level II evidence--diagnostic tests and criteria.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.injury.2015.07.003

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 263

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Palmer, C. S., Gabbe, B. J., & Cameron, P. A.
Affiliations
  • Royal Children's Hospital (AU)
  • Swansea University (GB)
  • Hamad Medical Corporation (QA)
Corresponding author
  • Palmer, Cameron S
  • Gabbe, Belinda J
  • Cameron, Peter A
ORCID
Venue
Injury
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-01
Volume
47
Issue
1
Pages
109-115
ISSN
0020-1383 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.injury.2015.07.003
OpenAlex
W2218367559
Cited by
263
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 2
FWCI
9.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Injury (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Trauma Management and Diagnosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Keywords
severe trauma, Abbreviated Injury Scale, Injury Severity Score, New Injury Severity Score, trauma mortality, trauma registry, intensive care unit admission, urgent surgery
MeSH terms
Humans, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Population Surveillance, Registries, Trauma Centers, Victoria, Wounds and Injuries, Abbreviated Injury Scale

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review