The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A new hybrid ensemble feature selection framework for machine learning-based phishing detection system
Open accessAbstract
This paper proposes a new feature selection framework for machine learning-based phishing detection system, called the Hybrid Ensemble Feature Selection (HEFS). In the first phase of HEFS, a novel Cumulative Distribution Function gradient (CDF-g) algorithm is exploited to produce primary feature subsets, which are then fed into a data perturbation ensemble to yield secondary feature subsets. The second phase derives a set of baseline features from the secondary feature subsets by using a function perturbation ensemble. The overall experimental results suggest that HEFS performs best when it is integrated with Random Forest classifier , where the baseline features correctly distinguish 94.6% of phishing and legitimate websites using only 20.8% of the original features. In another experiment, the baseline features (10 in total) utilised on Random Forest outperforms the set of all features (48 in total) used on SVM, Naive Bayes, C4.5, JRip, and PART classifiers. HEFS also shows promising results when benchmarked using another well-known phishing dataset from the University of California Irvine (UCI) repository. Hence, the HEFS is a highly desirable and practical feature selection technique for machine learning-based phishing detection systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Machine learning based phishing detection from URLs
Sahingoz, O. K., Buber, E., Demir, O., & Diri, B. (2019) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2018.09.029 · Cited by 857
CANTINA+: A Feature-Rich Machine Learning Framework for Detecting Phishing Web Sites
Xiang, G., Hong, J., Rose, C. P., & Cranor, L. (2011) · ACM Transactions on Information and System Security · doi:10.1145/2019599.2019606 · Cited by 495
A framework for detection and measurement of phishing attacks
Garera, S., Provos, N., Chew, M., & Rubin, A. D. (2007) · Proceedings of the 2007 ACM workshop on Recurring malcode · doi:10.1145/1314389.1314391 · Cited by 489
Phishing detection based Associative Classification data mining
Abdelhamid, N., Ayesh, A., & Thabtah, F. (2014) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2014.03.019 · Cited by 357
New rule-based phishing detection method
Moghimi, M., & Varjani, A. Y. (2016) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2016.01.028 · Cited by 250
An assessment of features related to phishing websites using an automated technique
Mohammad, R. M. A., Thabtah, F., & McCluskey, T. L. (2012) · University of Huddersfield Repository (University of Huddersfield) · Cited by 202
Tutorial and critical analysis of phishing websites methods
Mohammad, R. M., Thabtah, F., & McCluskey, L. (2015) · Computer Science Review · doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2015.04.001 · Cited by 164
Utilisation of website logo for phishing detection
Chiew, K. L., Chang, E. H., Sze, S. N., & Tiong, W. K. (2015) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2015.07.006 · Cited by 143
Self-citationA survey and classification of web phishing detection schemes
Varshney, G., Misra, M., & Atrey, P. K. (2016) · Security and Communication Networks · doi:10.1002/sec.1674 · Cited by 135
Intelligent phishing website detection using random forest classifier
Subaşı, A., Molah, E., Almkallawi, F., et al. (2017) · International Conference on Electrical and Computing Technologies and Applications (ICECTA) · doi:10.1109/icecta.2017.8252051 · Cited by 124
Cited by
A comprehensive survey of AI-enabled phishing attacks detection techniques
Basit, A., Zafar, M., Liu, X., Javed, A. R., Jalil, Z., & Kifayat, K. (2021) · Telecommunication Systems · doi:10.1007/s11235-020-00733-2 · Cited by 429
Explainable Artificial Intelligence in CyberSecurity: A Survey
Capuano, N., Fenza, G., Loia, V., & Stanzione, C. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3204171 · Cited by 330
“Hybrid Ensemble Feature Selection (HEFS) is an interesting approach proposed in [155] with a new feature selection framework.”
BackgroundA survey of phishing attack techniques, defence mechanisms and open research challenges
Jain, A. K., & Gupta, B. B. (2022) · Enterprise Information Systems · doi:10.1080/17517575.2021.1896786 · Cited by 192
Hannousse, A., & Yahiouche, S. (2021) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2021.104347 · Cited by 157
Look before you leap: Detecting phishing web pages by exploiting raw URL and HTML characteristics
Opara, C., Chen, Y., & Wei, B. (2024) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121183 · Cited by 129
Metadata
- Authors
- Chiew, K. L., Tan, C. L., Wong, K., Yong, K. S. C., & Tiong, W. K.
- Venue
- Information Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-05
- Volume
- 484
- Pages
- 153-166
- ISSN
- 0020-0255 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2914801588
- Cited by
- 348
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 49.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A new hybrid ensemble feature selection framework for machine learning-based phishing detection system. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ins.2019.01.064
- The paper
- Chiew, K. L., Tan, C. L., Wong, K., Yong, K. S. C., & Tiong, W. K. (2019). A new hybrid ensemble feature selection framework for machine learning-based phishing detection system. Information Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2019.01.064
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.