Cited by 24Opportunistic and Delay-Tolerant NetworksEvolutionary Game Theory and CooperationMobile Ad Hoc Networks

Incentive mechanism for cooperative authentication: An evolutionary game approach

Fang, Liang, Shi, Guozhen, Wang, Lianhai, Li, Yongjun, Xu, Shujiang, Guo, Yunchuan·2020·Information Sciences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ins.2019.07.030

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fang, L., Shi, G., Wang, L., Li, Y., Xu, S., & Guo, Y.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Beijing Electronic Science and Technology Institute (CN)
  • Qilu University of Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Guo, Yunchuan
Venue
Information Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-07
Volume
527
Pages
369-381
ISSN
0020-0255 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2962412866
Cited by
24
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6
FWCI
1.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Information Sciences (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Opportunistic and Delay-Tolerant Networks
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Mobile Ad Hoc Networks
Keywords
mobile opportunistic networks, incentive mechanisms, evolutionary game theory, evolutionarily stable strategy, selfish nodes, behavior dynamics, decentralized cooperation, message filtering, resource-constrained nodes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review