The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Non-life rate-making with Bayesian GAMs
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The linear predictor assumption in Cox and AFT models can be too restrictive for continuous variables like age or premium.
“Since this assumption can be too restrictive for continuous variables like the customers' age or the premium levels (Denuit and Lang 2004; James et al. 2013), they are traditionally segmented into categories, often unrelated to the data (Dougherty et al. 1995; Ohlsson and Johansson 2010).”
From Factors Driving Duration to Cross-Selling in Non-Life Insurance: New Empirical Evidence from Switzerland (2022) · cites this paper as Denuit and Lang 2004
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 46 · Cited by 75
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- Besag, 1991, Bayesian image restoration with two applications in spatial statistics (with discussion), Ann. Inst. Stat. Math., 43, 1, 10.1007/BF00116466 · DOI
- Boskov, 1994, Premium rating by geographic area using spatial models, ASTIN Bull., 24, 131, 10.2143/AST.24.1.2005085 · DOI
- Brockman, 1992, Statistical motor rating: making effective use of your data, J. Inst. Actuaries, 119, 457, 10.1017/S0020268100019995 · DOI
- Brouhns, 2002, Ratemaking by geographical area in the Boskov and Verrall model: a case study using Belgian car insurance data, actu-L, 2, 3
- Cebrian, 2003, Generalized Pareto fit to the society of Actuaries’ large claims database, North Am. Actuarial J., 7, 18, 10.1080/10920277.2003.10596098 · DOI
- Coutts, 1984, Motor premium rating, Insurance: Math. Econ., 3, 73, 10.1016/0167-6687(84)90046-5 · DOI
- Dimakos, 2002, Bayesian premium rating with latent structure, Scand. Actuarial J., 162, 10.1080/034612302320179854 · DOI
- Dionne, 1989, A generalization of actuarial automobile insurance rating models: the Negative Binomial distribution with a regression component, ASTIN Bull., 19, 199, 10.2143/AST.19.2.2014909 · DOI
- Dionne, 1992, Automobile insurance ratemaking in the presence of asymmetrical information, J. Appl. Econ., 7, 149, 10.1002/jae.3950070204 · DOI · Paper page
- Eilers, 1996, Flexible smoothing using B-splines and penalized likelihood (with comments and rejoinder), Stat. Sci., 11, 89, 10.1214/ss/1038425655 · DOI
- Fahrmeir, 2004, Penalized additive regression for space-time data: a Bayesian perspective, Stat. Sin., 14, 713
- Fahrmeir, 2001, Bayesian inference for generalized additive mixed models based on Markov random field priors, J. R. Stat. Soc. C, 50, 201, 10.1111/1467-9876.00229 · DOI
- Fahrmeir, 2001, Bayesian semiparametric regression analysis of multicategorical time-space data, Ann. Inst. Stat. Math., 53, 10, 10.1023/A:1017904118167 · DOI
- Friedman, 1991, Multivariate adaptive regression splines (with discussion), Ann. Stat., 19, 1, 10.1214/aos/1176347963 · DOI
- Haberman, 1996, Generalized linear models and actuarial science, The Statistician, 45, 407, 10.2307/2988543 · DOI
- Hastie, 1993, Varying-coefficient models, J. R. Stat. Soc. B, 55, 757, 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1993.tb01939.x · DOI
- Jørgensen, 1994, Fitting Tweedie’s compound Poisson model to insurance claims data, Scand. Actuarial J., 69, 10.1080/03461238.1994.10413930 · DOI
- Lang, 2004, Bayesian P-splines, J. Comput. Graph. Stat., 13, 183, 10.1198/1061860043010 · DOI
- Lin, 1999, Inference in Generalized Additive Mixed Models by using Smoothing Splines, J. R. Stat. Soc. B, 61, 381, 10.1111/1467-9868.00183 · DOI
- Makov, 2002, Principal applications of Bayesian methods in actuarial science: a perspective, North Am. Actuarial J., 5, 53, 10.1080/10920277.2001.10596011 · DOI
- Ngo, L., Wand, M.P., 2003. Smoothing with mixed model software. J. Stat. Software 9. Also available at http://www.maths.unsw.edu.au/~wand/. · DOI
- Renshaw, 1994, Modeling the claims process in the presence of covariates, ASTIN Bull., 24, 265, 10.2143/AST.24.2.2005070 · DOI · Paper page
- Scollnick, 1996, An introduction to MCMC and their applications, Proc. Casualty Actuarial Soc., 158, 114
- Spiegelhalter, 2002, Bayesian measures of model complexity and fits (with discussion), J. R. Stat. Soc. B, 64, 583, 10.1111/1467-9868.00353 · DOI · Paper page
- Wand, 2003, Smoothing and mixed models, Comput. Stat., 18, 223, 10.1007/s001800300142 · DOI
- Wood, 2000, Modelling and smoothing parameter estimation with multiple quadratic penalties, J. R. Stat. Soc. B, 62, 413, 10.1111/1467-9868.00240 · DOI
- Wood, 2001, mgcv: GAMs and generalized ridge regression for R, R News, 1, 20
- Wood, 2003, Thin plate regression splines, J. R. Stat. Soc. B, 65, 95, 10.1111/1467-9868.00374 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Denuit, M., & Lang, S.
- Affiliations
- UCLouvain (BE)
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Denuit, Michel
- Venue
- Insurance: Mathematics and Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-12
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 627-647
- ISSN
- 0167-6687 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2061289251
- Cited by
- 75
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 3.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Insurance Mathematics and Economics (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) (submittedVersion)
- Digital Access to Libraries (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Probability and Risk Models
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Insurance and Financial Risk Management
- Social Sciences › Demography › Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
- Keywords
- risk factors, spatial risk factors, insurance pricing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review