Generalized linear models for dependent frequency and severity of insurance claims
Open accessAbstract
Traditionally, claim counts and amounts are assumed to be independent in non-life insurance. This paper explores how this often unwarranted assumption can be relaxed in a simple way while incorporating rating factors into the model. The approach consists of fitting generalized linear models to the marginal frequency and the conditional severity components of the total claim cost; dependence between them is induced by treating the number of claims as a covariate in the model for the average claim size. In addition to being easy to implement, this modeling strategy has the advantage that when Poisson counts are assumed together with a log-link for the conditional severity model, the resulting pure premium is the product of a marginal mean frequency, a modified marginal mean severity, and an easily interpreted correction term that reflects the dependence. The approach is illustrated through simulations and applied to a Canadian automobile insurance dataset.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Empirical studies show that claim counts and amounts are often dependent and negatively correlated in auto and health insurance.
“In practice, empirical studies show that claim counts and amounts are often dependent and negatively correlated in auto and health insurance (see, e.g., Frees et al. 2011; Garrido et al. 2016; Gschlößl and Czado 2007; Shi et al. 2015).”
From Modelling Motor Insurance Claim Frequency and Severity Using Gradient Boosting (2023) · cites this paper as Garrido et al. 2016
Insurers tend to model separately the claim frequency and average claim severity using GLMs.
“insurers tend to model separately the claim frequency and average claim severity using GLMs”
From Modelling Motor Insurance Claim Frequency and Severity Using Gradient Boosting (2023) · cites this paper as Garrido et al. 2016
Cites
Spatial modelling of claim frequency and claim size in non-life insurance
Gschlößl, S., & Czado, C. (2007) · Scandinavian Actuarial Journal · doi:10.1080/03461230701414764 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Boosting Insights in Insurance Tariff Plans with Tree-Based Machine Learning Methods
Henckaerts, R., Côté, M.-P., Antonio, K., & Verbelen, R. (2021) · North American Actuarial Journal · doi:10.1080/10920277.2020.1745656 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Modelling Motor Insurance Claim Frequency and Severity Using Gradient Boosting
Clemente, C., Guerreiro, G. R., & Bravo, J. M. (2023) · Risks · doi:10.3390/risks11090163 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Stochastic gradient boosting frequency-severity model of insurance claims
Su, X., & Bai, M. (2020) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0238000 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Predictive claim scores for dynamic multi-product risk classification in insurance
Verschuren, R. M. (2021) · ASTIN Bulletin · doi:10.1017/asb.2020.34 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
- Authors
- Garrido, J., Genest, C., & Schulz, J.
- Affiliations
- Concordia University (CA)
- McGill University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Genest, C.
- Venue
- Insurance: Mathematics and Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-09
- Volume
- 70
- Pages
- 205-215
- ISSN
- 0167-6687 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2270040251
- Cited by
- 131
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 10.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Insurance Mathematics and Economics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN/39476–2011, RGPIN/36860–2012)
- Canadian Statistical Sciences Institute
- Fonds de recherche du Québec—Nature et technologies (2015–PR–183236)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Probability and Risk Models
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Insurance and Financial Risk Management
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
- Keywords
- non-life insurance, claim frequency, claim severity, generalized linear models, pure premium, rating factors, automobile insurance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review