Cited by 131Probability and Risk ModelsInsurance and Financial Risk ManagementStatistical Distribution Estimation and Applications

Generalized linear models for dependent frequency and severity of insurance claims

Open access
Garrido, J., Genest, C., Schulz, J.·2016·Insurance: Mathematics and Economics

Abstract

Traditionally, claim counts and amounts are assumed to be independent in non-life insurance. This paper explores how this often unwarranted assumption can be relaxed in a simple way while incorporating rating factors into the model. The approach consists of fitting generalized linear models to the marginal frequency and the conditional severity components of the total claim cost; dependence between them is induced by treating the number of claims as a covariate in the model for the average claim size. In addition to being easy to implement, this modeling strategy has the advantage that when Poisson counts are assumed together with a log-link for the conditional severity model, the resulting pure premium is the product of a marginal mean frequency, a modified marginal mean severity, and an easily interpreted correction term that reflects the dependence. The approach is illustrated through simulations and applied to a Canadian automobile insurance dataset.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2016.06.006

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Empirical studies show that claim counts and amounts are often dependent and negatively correlated in auto and health insurance.

    “In practice, empirical studies show that claim counts and amounts are often dependent and negatively correlated in auto and health insurance (see, e.g., Frees et al. 2011; Garrido et al. 2016; Gschlößl and Czado 2007; Shi et al. 2015).”

    From Modelling Motor Insurance Claim Frequency and Severity Using Gradient Boosting (2023) · cites this paper as Garrido et al. 2016

  • Insurers tend to model separately the claim frequency and average claim severity using GLMs.

    “insurers tend to model separately the claim frequency and average claim severity using GLMs”

    From Modelling Motor Insurance Claim Frequency and Severity Using Gradient Boosting (2023) · cites this paper as Garrido et al. 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Garrido, J., Genest, C., & Schulz, J.
Affiliations
  • Concordia University (CA)
  • McGill University (CA)
Corresponding author
Genest, C.
Venue
Insurance: Mathematics and Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-09
Volume
70
Pages
205-215
ISSN
0167-6687 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2270040251
Cited by
131
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2
FWCI
10.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Insurance Mathematics and Economics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN/39476–2011, RGPIN/36860–2012)
  • Canadian Statistical Sciences Institute
  • Fonds de recherche du Québec—Nature et technologies (2015–PR–183236)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Probability and Risk Models
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Insurance and Financial Risk Management
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
Keywords
non-life insurance, claim frequency, claim severity, generalized linear models, pure premium, rating factors, automobile insurance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review