Cited by 24Probability and Risk ModelsInsurance and Financial Risk ManagementStatistical Methods and Inference

Stochastic gradient boosting frequency-severity model of insurance claims

Open access
Su, Xiaoshan, Bai, Manying·2020·PLOS ONE

Abstract

The standard GLM and GAM frequency-severity models assume independence between the claim frequency and severity. To overcome restrictions of linear or additive forms and to relax the independence assumption, we develop a data-driven dependent frequency-severity model, where we combine a stochastic gradient boosting algorithm and a profile likelihood approach to estimate parameters for both of the claim frequency and average claim severity distributions, and where we introduce the dependence between the claim frequency and severity by treating the claim frequency as a predictor in the regression model for the average claim severity. The model can flexibly capture the nonlinear relation between the claim frequency (severity) and predictors and complex interactions among predictors and can fully capture the nonlinear dependence between the claim frequency and severity. A simulation study shows excellent prediction performance of our model. Then, we demonstrate the application of our model with a French auto insurance claim data. The results show that our model is superior to other state-of-the-art models.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0238000

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For both claim frequency and claim severity models, a grid search procedure was used to calibrate boosting and decision tree-specific hyperparameters.

    “For both the claim frequency and claim severity models, a grid search procedure was used to calibrate the boosting and the decision tree-specific hyperparameters (Su and Bai 2020).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Su, X., & Bai, M.
Affiliations
Beihang University (CN)
Corresponding author
Su, Xiaoshan
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2020-08-31
Volume
15
Issue
8
Pages
e0238000
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3082368934
Cited by
24
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (71333014, 71571007)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Probability and Risk Models
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Insurance and Financial Risk Management
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
Keywords
insurance claims, stochastic gradient boosting, profile likelihood, nonlinear dependence, automobile insurance
MeSH terms
Insurance Claim Review, Stochastic Processes, Models, Statistical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review