Historical increase in the number of factors measured by commercial tests of cognitive ability: Are we overfactoring?
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The number of composite- and index-level scores on the WISC-V has doubled from its predecessor without much discernable change in the composition of the test.
“Consistent with a long -standing trend in intelligence test development, the number of composite -and index -level scores on the WISC -V has doubled from its predecessor without much discernable change in the composition of the test (Frazier and Youngstrom 2007).”
From Beyond Primary Assessment on the WISC-V: An Investigation of the Structural Validity of the Ancillary Scores (2025) · cites this paper as Frazier and Youngstrom 2007
Cites
Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 · Cited by 23,433 · see citing works
A Reliability Coefficient for Maximum Likelihood Factor Analysis
Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02291170 · Cited by 7,330 · see citing works
O’connor, B. P. (2000) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03200807 · Cited by 4,116 · see citing works
Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations
Velicer, W. F. (1976) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02293557 · Cited by 2,438 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Clark, D. A., & Bowles, R. P. (2018) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273171.2018.1461058 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Canivez, G. L., Konold, T. R., Collins, J. M., & Wilson, G. (2009) · School Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.1037/a0018030 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Canivez, G. L., Watkins, M. W., & Dombrowski, S. C. (2016) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/pas0000238 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Dombrowski, S. C., Canivez, G. L., Watkins, M. W., & Alexander Beaujean, A. (2015) · Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.intell.2015.10.009 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Factor Structure of the 10 WISC-V Primary Subtests Across Four Standardization Age Groups
Dombrowski, S. C., Canivez, G. L., & Watkins, M. W. (2018) · Contemporary School Psychology · doi:10.1007/s40688-017-0125-2 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Heeren, A., Maurage, P., Rossignol, M., Vanhaelen, M., Peschard, V., Eeckhout, C., & Philippot, P. (2012) · Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement · doi:10.1037/a0026249 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Canivez, G. L., McGill, R. J., Dombrowski, S. C., Watkins, M. W., Pritchard, A. E., & Jacobson, L. A. (2020) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191118811609 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Beaujean, A. A., Parkin, J., & Parker, S. (2014) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/a0036745 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Canivez, G. L., Dombrowski, S. C., & Watkins, M. W. (2018) · Psychology in the Schools · doi:10.1002/pits.22138 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
McGill, R. J., Dombrowski, S. C., & Canivez, G. L. (2025) · Psychology in the Schools · doi:10.1002/pits.23457 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“V has doubled from its predecessor without much discernable change in the composition of the test (Frazier and Youngstrom 2007).”
- Authors
- Frazier, T. W., & Youngstrom, E. A.
- Affiliations
- Cleveland Clinic (US)
- University Hospitals of Cleveland (US)
- Corresponding author
- Frazier, Thomas W.
- Venue
- Intelligence
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-03
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 169-182
- ISSN
- 0160-2896 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2154955734
- Cited by
- 123
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 8.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Intelligence (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Keywords
- cognitive ability tests, number of factors, factor structure, history of intelligence testing, parallel analysis, test length, general intelligence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review