Cited by 41Cognitive Abilities and TestingSport Psychology and PerformanceEducation, Achievement, and Giftedness

Introduction to the intelligence special issue on the development of expertise: is ability necessary?

Detterman, Douglas K.·2014·Intelligence

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.intell.2014.02.004

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • General cognitive ability strongly predicts academic achievement and job performance.

    “It is widely acknowledged that general cognitive ability is a major predictor of academic achievement and job performance (Detterman, 2014;Gobet, 2016;Schmidt, 2017;Wai, Brown, & Chabris, 2018).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Detterman, D. K.
Affiliations
Case Western Reserve University (US)
Corresponding author
Detterman, Douglas K.
Venue
Intelligence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-07
Volume
45
Pages
1-5
ISSN
0160-2896 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2047393457
Cited by
41
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Intelligence (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Keywords
expertise development, expert performance, IQ, ability, sample selection bias, NBA players, height, educational outcomes, Binet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review