Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 267

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

High frequency volatility co-movements in cryptocurrency markets

Open access
Katsiampa, Paraskevi, Corbet, Shaen, Lucey, Brian·2019·Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money

Abstract

Through the application of Diagonal BEKK and Asymmetric Diagonal BEKK methodologies to intra-day data for eight cryptocurrencies, this paper investigates not only conditional volatility dynamics of major cryptocurrencies, but also their volatility co-movements. We first provide evidence that all conditional variances are significantly affected by both previous squared errors and past conditional volatility. It is also shown that both methodologies indicate that cryptocurrency investors pay the most attention to news relating to Neo and the least attention to news relating to Dash, while shocks in OmiseGo persist the least and shocks in Bitcoin persist the most, although all of the considered cryptocurrencies possess high levels of persistence of volatility over time. We also demonstrate that the conditional covariances are significantly affected by both cross-products of past error terms and past conditional covariances, suggesting strong interdependencies between cryptocurrencies. It is also demonstrated that the Asymmetric Diagonal BEKK model is a superior choice of methodology, with our results suggesting significant asymmetric effects of positive and negative shocks in the conditional volatility of the price returns of all of our investigated cryptocurrencies, while the conditional covariances capture asymmetric effects of good and bad news accordingly. Finally, it is shown that time-varying conditional correlations exist, with our selected cryptocurrencies being strongly positively correlated, further highlighting interdependencies within cryptocurrency markets.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.intfin.2019.05.003

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

2 retracted

Show all 43 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Baur, 2018, Asymmetric volatility in cryptocurrencies, Econ. Lett., 173, 148, 10.1016/j.econlet.2018.10.008 · doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2018.10.008
  2. Choudhry, 2008, Forecasting ability of garch vs kalman filter method: evidence from daily uk time-varying beta, J. Forecast., 27, 670, 10.1002/for.1096 · doi:10.1002/for.1096
  3. Coudert, 2015, Internationalization versus regionalization in the emerging stock markets, Int. J. Finance Econ., 20, 16, 10.1002/ijfe.1501 · doi:10.1002/ijfe.1501
  4. Degiannakis, 2010, Hedge ratios in South African stock index futures, J. Emerg. Market Finance, 9, 285, 10.1177/097265271000900302 · doi:10.1177/097265271000900302
  5. Griffins, J., Shams, A., 2018. Is bitcoin really un-tethered. Available at SSRN 13 June 2018. · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3195066
  6. Maheu, 2011, Do high-frequency measures of volatility improve forecasts of return distributions?, J. Econ., 160, 69, 10.1016/j.jeconom.2010.03.016 · doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2010.03.016

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Katsiampa, P., Corbet, S., & Lucey, B.
Venue
Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-09
Volume
62
Pages
35-52
ISSN
1042-4431 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2951806883
Cited by
267
References
43
FWCI
34.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High frequency volatility co-movements in cryptocurrency markets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.intfin.2019.05.003
The paper
Katsiampa, P., Corbet, S., & Lucey, B. (2019). High frequency volatility co-movements in cryptocurrency markets. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2019.05.003

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.