The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High frequency volatility co-movements in cryptocurrency markets
Open accessAbstract
Through the application of Diagonal BEKK and Asymmetric Diagonal BEKK methodologies to intra-day data for eight cryptocurrencies, this paper investigates not only conditional volatility dynamics of major cryptocurrencies, but also their volatility co-movements. We first provide evidence that all conditional variances are significantly affected by both previous squared errors and past conditional volatility. It is also shown that both methodologies indicate that cryptocurrency investors pay the most attention to news relating to Neo and the least attention to news relating to Dash, while shocks in OmiseGo persist the least and shocks in Bitcoin persist the most, although all of the considered cryptocurrencies possess high levels of persistence of volatility over time. We also demonstrate that the conditional covariances are significantly affected by both cross-products of past error terms and past conditional covariances, suggesting strong interdependencies between cryptocurrencies. It is also demonstrated that the Asymmetric Diagonal BEKK model is a superior choice of methodology, with our results suggesting significant asymmetric effects of positive and negative shocks in the conditional volatility of the price returns of all of our investigated cryptocurrencies, while the conditional covariances capture asymmetric effects of good and bad news accordingly. Finally, it is shown that time-varying conditional correlations exist, with our selected cryptocurrencies being strongly positively correlated, further highlighting interdependencies within cryptocurrency markets.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
2 retracted
RETRACTED: Cryptocurrencies as a financial asset: A systematic analysis
Corbet, S., Lucey, B., Urquhart, A., & Yarovaya, L. (2019) · International Review of Financial Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.irfa.2018.09.003 · Cited by 1,172
Self-citationRetractedRETRACTED: Datestamping the Bitcoin and Ethereum bubbles
Corbet, S., Lucey, B., & Yarovaya, L. (2018) · Finance Research Letters · doi:10.1016/j.frl.2017.12.006 · Cited by 638
Self-citationRetractedBetter to give than to receive: Predictive directional measurement of volatility spillovers
Diebold, F. X., & Yilmaz, K. (2012) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2011.02.006 · Cited by 5,756
Multivariate Simultaneous Generalized ARCH
Engle, R. F., & Kroner, K. F. (1995) · Econometric Theory · doi:10.1017/s0266466600009063 · Cited by 4,487
Modeling Asymmetric Comovements of Asset Returns
Kroner, K. F., & Ng, V. K. (1998) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/11.4.817 · Cited by 1,585
On the hedge and safe haven properties of Bitcoin: Is it really more than a diversifier?
Bouri, E., Molnár, P., Azzi, G., Roubaud, D., & Hagfors, L. I. (2017) · Finance Research Letters · doi:10.1016/j.frl.2016.09.025 · Cited by 1,432
Exploring the dynamic relationships between cryptocurrencies and other financial assets
Corbet, S., Meegan, A., Larkin, C., Lucey, B., & Yarovaya, L. (2018) · Economics Letters · doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2018.01.004 · Cited by 1,335
Self-citationIntraday periodicity and volatility persistence in financial markets
Andersen, T. G., & Bollerslev, T. (1997) · Journal of Empirical Finance · doi:10.1016/s0927-5398(97)00004-2 · Cited by 1,299
Volatility estimation for Bitcoin: A comparison of GARCH models
Katsiampa, P. (2017) · Economics Letters · doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2017.06.023 · Cited by 1,181
Self-citationA Closed-Form GARCH Option Valuation Model
Heston, S. L., & Nandi, S. (2000) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/13.3.585 · Cited by 971
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Baur, 2018, Asymmetric volatility in cryptocurrencies, Econ. Lett., 173, 148, 10.1016/j.econlet.2018.10.008 · doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2018.10.008
- Choudhry, 2008, Forecasting ability of garch vs kalman filter method: evidence from daily uk time-varying beta, J. Forecast., 27, 670, 10.1002/for.1096 · doi:10.1002/for.1096
- Coudert, 2015, Internationalization versus regionalization in the emerging stock markets, Int. J. Finance Econ., 20, 16, 10.1002/ijfe.1501 · doi:10.1002/ijfe.1501
- Degiannakis, 2010, Hedge ratios in South African stock index futures, J. Emerg. Market Finance, 9, 285, 10.1177/097265271000900302 · doi:10.1177/097265271000900302
- Griffins, J., Shams, A., 2018. Is bitcoin really un-tethered. Available at SSRN 13 June 2018. · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3195066
- Maheu, 2011, Do high-frequency measures of volatility improve forecasts of return distributions?, J. Econ., 160, 69, 10.1016/j.jeconom.2010.03.016 · doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2010.03.016
Cited by
Data money makers: An ethnographic analysis of a global cryptocurrency community
Caliskan, K. (2022) · The British Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1111/1468-4446.12916 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Katsiampa, P., Corbet, S., & Lucey, B.
- Venue
- Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-09
- Volume
- 62
- Pages
- 35-52
- ISSN
- 1042-4431 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2951806883
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 43
- FWCI
- 34.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High frequency volatility co-movements in cryptocurrency markets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.intfin.2019.05.003
- The paper
- Katsiampa, P., Corbet, S., & Lucey, B. (2019). High frequency volatility co-movements in cryptocurrency markets. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2019.05.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.