MMP10 alleviates non-alcoholic steatohepatitis by regulating macrophage M2 polarization
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), the most severe form of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), is currently untreatable with a clinically validated treatment. Matrix Metallopeptidase 10 (MMP10) is a common host-response-gene involved in the immune response. However, it remains unknown whether and how MMP10 influences NASH development by modulating macrophage function. METHODS: In vitro, MMP10 overexpression (MMP10-OE), MMP10 knockout (MMP10-KO), proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ)-OE, and control plasmids were transfected into primary Kupffer cells, which were then cultured with or without Interleukin (IL)-4 stimulation. MMP10-OE mice and MMP10-KO mice were fed a normal chow diet (NCD) or a high-fat diet (HFD) for 30 weeks to study the role of MMP10 in NASH model. Hepa1-6 cells were cultured with or without free fatty acid (FFA) treatment for 24 h. RESULTS: MMP10 is downregulated in NASH, and M1/M2 indicators are significantly imbalanced. MMP10 is triggered in response to M2 macrophages polarization. MMP10 overexpression diminishes hepatic steatosis and inflammation in HFD-induced NASH. Mechanistically, PPARγ can bind to the MMP10 promoter and then up-regulates MMP10 expression, which is engaged when IL-4 stimulates M2 macrophage polarization. The downstream STAT3 signaling pathway is further activated to induce M2 polarization, which results in a decreased expression of the pro-inflammatory IL-1β and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-a and an increased expression of the anti-inflammatory IL-10, ultimately alleviating NASH progression. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that IL-4 effectively promotes MMP10 expression via PPARγ, and MMP10 overexpression modulates macrophage polarization, hepatic steatosis, and fibrosis, offering prospective targets for NASH treatment.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
STAT3 activation is generally associated with restorative polarization and attenuation of fibrosis, whereas STAT1 signaling correlates with pro-fibrotic phenotypes and cirrhosis.
“STAT3 activation is generally associated with restorative polarization and attenuation of fibrosis, whereas STAT1 signaling correlates with pro-fibrotic phenotypes and cirrhosis (47, 57, 58).”
From Strategies to promote liver fibrosis amelioration with involvement of restorative macrophages (2026) · cites this paper as [57]
PPARγ directly enhances transcription of matrix-remodeling genes such as MMP-10 during IL-4-driven polarization in RAW264.7 cells.
“At the molecular level, PPARγ directly enhances transcription of matrix-remodeling genes such as MMP-10 during IL-4–driven polarization, as demonstrated in RAW264.7 cells (57).”
From Strategies to promote liver fibrosis amelioration with involvement of restorative macrophages (2026) · cites this paper as [57]
Cites
Yunna, C., Mengru, H., Lei, W., & Weidong, C. (2020) · European Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2020.173090 · Cited by 2,454 · see citing works
Kim, D., Li, A. A., Gadiparthi, C., Khan, M. A., Cholankeril, G., Glenn, J. S., & Ahmed, A. (2018) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2018.07.008 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
Rao, L.-Z., Wang, Y., Zhang, L., Wu, G., Zhang, L., Wang, F.-X., Chen, L.-M., Sun, F., Jia, S., Zhang, S., et al. (2021) · Cell Death & Differentiation · doi:10.1038/s41418-020-00650-6 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Strategies to promote liver fibrosis amelioration with involvement of restorative macrophages
Aquino, J. B. (2026) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2026.1792423 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“…metabolic cofactor such as tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4) (119); matrix remodeling enzymes such as matrix metalloproteinase-10 (MMP10; stromelysin-2) (57); transcription factors including nuclear receptor subfamily 4 group A member 1 (Nr4A1) (120) and nuclear factor erythroid 2 – related Factor 2…”
- Authors
- Chang, L., Gao, J., Yu, Y., Liao, B., Zhou, Y., Zhang, J., Ma, X., Hou, W., Zhou, T., & Xu, Q.
- Affiliations
- Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN)
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
- Fudan University (CN)
- East China Normal University (CN)
- University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Hou, Weilian
- Zhou, Tao
- Xu, Qihua
- Venue
- International Immunopharmacology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-11
- Volume
- 124
- Issue
- Pt B
- Pages
- 111045
- ISSN
- 1567-5769 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4387647172
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 3
- FWCI
- 3.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Immunopharmacology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (82100616, 82100689)
- Shanghai Municipal Youth Science and Technology Star Project (21YF1434700)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Diseases and Immunity
- Keywords
- MMP-10, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, M2 macrophage polarization, Kupffer cells, PPARγ, IL-4, STAT3 signaling, hepatic steatosis, liver fibrosis, liver inflammation, high-fat diet, IL-10, IL-1β, TNF-α
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Liver, Macrophages, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Inbred Strains, Interleukin-4, PPAR gamma, Mice, Matrix Metalloproteinase 10, Diet, High-Fat, Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review