Cited by 26Digital Mental Health InterventionsTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Development and evaluation of an internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy intervention for anxiety and depression in adults with cystic fibrosis (eHealth CF-CBT): an international collaboration

Open access
Verkleij, Marieke, Georgiopoulos, Anna M., Friedman, Deborah·2021·Internet Interventions

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Individuals with cystic fibrosis (CF) are at increased risk for anxiety and depression, with negative consequences for adherence, health, and quality of life. New approaches to prevent and treat anxiety and depression that are tailored to the concerns of this population are needed. A CF-specific internet-based cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) intervention was developed to increase access to evidence-based mental health care and decrease cost and burden of care for people with CF. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the usability and acceptability of "eHealth CF-CBT," an internet-based program integrating therapist-guided online self-management modules with in-person or virtual sessions. METHODS: = 16) and CF health care providers (N = 16) systematically tested all sessions of the eHealth CF-CBT program, provided qualitative feedback, and completed measures including eHealth Impact Questionnaire (eHIQ), and System Usability Scale (SUS). RESULTS: Patient and provider ratings of their overall impression of the eHealth CF-CBT program were high, with scores (mean; SD) of 8.3; 0.6 and 8.2; 0.8 respectively on a 10-point scale. Mean ratings of usability by patients (77.0/100) and providers (73.4/100) surpassed the SUS cut point for good favorability. Ratings (pooled mean; SD) on the assessed eHIQ domains Motivation and Confidence to Act (71.3; 10.0), Information and Presentation (78.9; 9.6), and Identification (62.0; 15.1) were positive, as were assessments of specific elements of session content and format. CONCLUSIONS: eHealth CF-CBT is the first therapist-guided internet-delivered CBT-based intervention for adults with CF. Initial evaluation with key stakeholders demonstrated high levels of acceptability and usability and provided input that was integrated to strengthen the program. Effectiveness testing in the Netherlands will be the next step, as well as future international adaptation and dissemination.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.invent.2021.100372

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pilot data from online CF-CBT studies demonstrate that the online CF-CBT program was both feasible and acceptable.

    “Pilot data from these studies also demonstrate that the online CF-CBT program was both feasible and acceptable (27).”

    From Virtual monitoring in CF – the importance of continuous monitoring in a multi-organ chronic condition (2023) · cites this paper as [27]

    The Results section (Acceptability and usability survey results; page not provided) reports favorable acceptability ratings and above-average usability scores for eHealth CF-CBT. But the Discussion describes this as beta testing and says a pilot study was still forthcoming. The paper therefore does not establish that pilot studies had demonstrated the program's feasibility. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Rayment J. Chapter 1: what is cystic fibrosis? Sher Y. Georgiopoulos A.M. Stern T.A. Facing Cystic Fibrosis: A Guide for Patients and Their Families 2020 Massachusetts General Hospital Psychiatry Academy Boston 1 8

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Verkleij, M., Georgiopoulos, A. M., & Friedman, D.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Verkleij, Marieke
Venue
Internet Interventions
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-04
Volume
24
Pages
100372
ISSN
2214-7829 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3131488986
Cited by
26
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
4.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Internet Interventions (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • NCFS
  • Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
cystic fibrosis, internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy, anxiety, depression, e-health, usability, acceptability, access to mental health care, System Usability Scale, stakeholder feedback

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review