The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Toward alternative metrics of journal impact: A comparison of download and citation data
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine
Brin, S., & Page, L. (1998) · Computer Networks and ISDN Systems · doi:10.1016/s0169-7552(98)00110-x · Cited by 16,004
Item-based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms
Sarwar, B., Karypis, G., Konstan, J., & Riedl, J. (2001) · Proceedings of the 10th international conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/371920.372071 · Cited by 9,135
Cited by
Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science
Bakkalbasi, N., Bauer, K., Glover, J., & Wang, L. (2006) · Biomedical Digital Libraries · doi:10.1186/1742-5581-3-7 · Cited by 752
A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures
Bollen, J., Van de Sompel, H., Hagberg, A., & Chute, R. (2009) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0006022 · Cited by 572
Self-citationHajjem, C., Harnad, S. R., & Gingras, Y. (2006) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.cs/0606079 · Cited by 352
Metadata
- Authors
- Bollen, J., Van de Sompel, H., Smith, J. A., & Luce, R.
- Venue
- Information Processing & Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-12
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1419-1440
- ISSN
- 0020-0271 (ISSN-L)
- 0306-4573
- OpenAlex
- W2153183607
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 19.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toward alternative metrics of journal impact: A comparison of download and citation data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ipm.2005.03.024
- The paper
- Bollen, J., Van de Sompel, H., Smith, J. A., & Luce, R. (2005). Toward alternative metrics of journal impact: A comparison of download and citation data. Information Processing & Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2005.03.024
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
