The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Contextual semantics for sentiment analysis of Twitter
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology.
Shelley, M., & Krippendorff, K. (1984) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2288384 · Cited by 24,312
Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology
Krippendorff, K. (2019) · doi:10.4135/9781071878781 · Cited by 15,448
Ambrose, A., Wittgenstein, L., & Anscombe, G. E. M. (1954) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.2307/2103745 · Cited by 12,192
Thumbs Up or Thumbs Down? Semantic Orientation Applied to Unsupervised Classification of Reviews
Peter, P., & Turney (2002) · Cited by 3,650
Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis
Wilson, T., Wiebe, J., & Hoffmann, P. (2005) · Proceedings of the conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing - HLT '05 · doi:10.3115/1220575.1220619 · Cited by 3,345
Lexicon-based methods for sentiment analysis
Taboada, M., Brooke, J., Tofiloski, M., Voll, K., & Stede, M. (2011) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli_a_00049 · Cited by 3,301
From Frequency to Meaning: Vector Space Models of Semantics
Turney, P. D., & Pantel, P. (2010) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.2934 · Cited by 2,866
Twitter as a Corpus for Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
Pak, A., & Paroubek, P. (2010) · Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC) · doi:10.63317/47akcj8foo4d · Cited by 2,704
SentiWordNet 3.0: An Enhanced Lexical Resource for Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
Baccianella, S., Esuli, A., & Sebastiani, F. (2010) · Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC) · doi:10.63317/2jktnrykui9s · Cited by 2,666
Psychological Aspects of Natural Language Use: Our Words, Our Selves
Pennebaker, J. W., Mehl, M. R., & Niederhoffer, K. G. (2003) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145041 · Cited by 2,624
Cited by
Deep Convolution Neural Networks for Twitter Sentiment Analysis
Jianqiang, Z., Xiaolin, G., & Xuejun, Z. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2017.2776930 · Cited by 482
A survey on classification techniques for opinion mining and sentiment analysis
Hemmatian, F., & Sohrabi, M. K. (2019) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-017-9599-6 · Cited by 371
Onan, A., Korukoğlu, S., & Bulut, H. (2017) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2017.02.008 · Cited by 305
Twitter sentiment analysis using hybrid cuckoo search method
Chandra Pandey, A., Singh Rajpoot, D., & Saraswat, M. (2017) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2017.02.004 · Cited by 299
A survey on sentiment analysis and opinion mining for social multimedia
Li, Z., Fan, Y., Jiang, B., Lei, T., & Liu, W. (2019) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-018-6445-z · Cited by 164
Metadata
- Authors
- Saif, H., He, Y., Fernandez, M., & Alani, H.
- Venue
- Information Processing & Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-01
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-19
- ISSN
- 0020-0271 (ISSN-L)
- 0306-4573
- OpenAlex
- W2062913298
- Cited by
- 425
- References
- 41
- FWCI
- 40.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contextual semantics for sentiment analysis of Twitter. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ipm.2015.01.005
- The paper
- Saif, H., He, Y., Fernandez, M., & Alani, H. (2016). Contextual semantics for sentiment analysis of Twitter. Information Processing & Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2015.01.005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
