The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Aspect-based sentiment analysis with alternating coattention networks
Abstract
Abstract Aspect-based sentiment analysis aims to predict the sentiment polarities of specific targets in a given text. Recent researches show great interest in modeling the target and context with attention network to obtain more effective feature representation for sentiment classification task. However, the use of an average vector of target for computing the attention score for context is unfair. Besides, the interaction mechanism is simple thus need to be further improved. To solve the above problems, this paper first proposes a coattention mechanism which models both target-level and context-level attention alternatively so as to focus on those key words of targets to learn more effective context representation. On this basis, we implement a Coattention-LSTM network which learns nonlinear representations of context and target simultaneously and can extracts more effective sentiment feature from coattention mechanism. Further, a Coattention-MemNet network which adopts a multiple-hops coattention mechanism is proposed to improve the sentiment classification result. Finally, we propose a new location weighted function which considers the location information to enhance the performance of coattention mechanism. Extensive experiments on two public datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of all proposed methods, and our findings in the experiments provide new insight for future developments of using attention mechanism and deep neural network for aspect-based sentiment analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
Effective Approaches to Attention-based Neural Machine Translation
Luong, T., Pham, H., & Manning, C. D. (2015) · Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d15-1166 · Cited by 8,382
Attention-based LSTM for Aspect-level Sentiment Classification
Wang, Y., Huang, M., zhu, X., & Zhao, L. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d16-1058 · Cited by 2,450
LSTM neural networks for language modeling
Sundermeyer, M., Schlüter, R., & Ney, H. (2012) · Interspeech 2012 · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2012-65 · Cited by 1,963
A Structured Self-attentive Sentence Embedding
Lin, Z., Feng, M., Santos, C. N. D., Yu, M., Xiang, B., Zhou, B., & Bengio, Y. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1703.03130 · Cited by 1,743
Cited by
Sentiment analysis using deep learning architectures: a review
Yadav, A., & Vishwakarma, D. K. (2020) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-019-09794-5 · Cited by 841
Sentiment Analysis Based on Deep Learning: A Comparative Study
Dang, N. C., Moreno-García, M. N., & De la Prieta, F. (2020) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics9030483 · Cited by 593
A survey on aspect-based sentiment classification
Brauwers, G., & Frasincar, F. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3503044 · Cited by 165
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, C., Zhang, H., Jiang, B., & Li, K.
- Venue
- Information Processing & Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-05
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 463-478
- ISSN
- 0020-0271 (ISSN-L)
- 0306-4573
- OpenAlex
- W2914820290
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 11.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Aspect-based sentiment analysis with alternating coattention networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ipm.2018.12.004
- The paper
- Yang, C., Zhang, H., Jiang, B., & Li, K. (2019). Aspect-based sentiment analysis with alternating coattention networks. Information Processing & Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2018.12.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.