CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 42Ethics and Social Impacts of AIExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Recommender Systems and Techniques

Responsible and human centric AI-based insurance advisors

Open access
Pisoni, Galena, Díaz-Rodríguez, Natalia·2023·Information Processing & Management
DOI 10.1016/j.ipm.2023.103273
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ipm.2023.103273

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. Alhijawi, B., & Kilani, Y. (2020). The recommender system: a survey. International Journal of Advanced Intelligence Paradigms, 15(3), 229-251.
  2. Al Ridhawi, I., Otoum, S., Aloqaily, M., & Boukerche, A. (2020). Generalizing AI: challenges and opportunities for plug and play AI solutions. IEEE Network, 35(1), 372-379
  3. Aggarwal, C. C. (2016). Recommender systems (Vol. 1). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  4. Bellamy, R. K., Dey, K., Hind, M., Hoffman, S. C., Houde, S., Kannan, K. & Zhang, Y. (2018). AI Fairness 360: An extensible toolkit for detecting, understanding, and mitigating unwanted algorithmic bias. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.01943. · arXiv
  5. Burke, R. (2002). Hybrid recommender systems: Survey and experiments. User modeling and user- adapted interaction, 12(4), 331-370.
  6. Brown, T. et al. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard business review, 86(6):84.
  7. Capponi, A., Olafsson, S., & Zariphopoulou, T. (2019). Personalized robo-advising: enhancing investment through client interactions. Available at SSRN 3453975.
  8. Collins, J. M. (2010). A review of financial advice models and the take-up of financial advice. Center for Financial Security WP, 10(5).
  9. Cheng, X., Guo, F., Chen, J., Li, K., Zhang, Y., & Gao, P. (2019). Exploring the Trust Influencing Mechanism of Robo-Advisor Service: A Mixed Method Approach. Sustainability, 11(18), 4917.
  10. Clavell, G. G., & Peuvrelle, V. (2020). Ethical Issues in Big Data Analytics for Time Critical Mobility Forecasting. In Big Data Analytics for Time-Critical Mobility Forecasting (pp. 343-358). Springer, Cham.
  11. Dunbar, I. et al. (2016). Robo-advice-short term fad, or the future of financial advice? Equity, 30(1):8.
  12. Flavián, C., Pérez-Rueda, A., Belanche, D., & Casaló, L. V. (2021). Intention to use analytical artificial intelligence (AI) in services-the effect of technology readiness and awareness. Journal of Service Management.
  13. Gatzert, N. and Holzmuller (2012). Creating customer value in participating life insurance. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 79(3):645-670.
  14. Gomber, P., Koch, J. A., & Siering, M. (2017). Digital Finance and FinTech: current research and future research directions. Journal of Business Economics, 87(5), 537-580.
  15. Gedikli, F., Jannach, D., & Ge, M. (2014). How should I explain? A comparison of different explanation types for recommender systems. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 72(4), 367-382.
  16. Gunning, D., & Aha, D. (2019). DARPA's explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) program. AI Magazine, 40(2), 44-58.
  17. Holzinger, A. (2016). Interactive machine learning for health informatics: when do we need the human-in- the-loop?. Brain Informatics, 3(2), 119-131.
  18. Karimi, A. H., Barthe, G., Schölkopf, B., & Valera, I. (2020). A survey of algorithmic recourse: definitions, formulations, solutions, and prospects. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.04050. · arXiv
  19. Kim, T. W. (2018). Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI), the goodness criteria and the grasp-ability test. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.09598. · arXiv
  20. Kumar, V. (2009). A process for practicing design innovation. Journal of Business Strategy, 30(2/3):91- 100.
  21. Kruse, L., Wunderlich, N., & Beck, R. (2019, January). Artificial intelligence for the financial services industry: What challenges organizations to succeed. In Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
  22. Lin, L.-Y. and Chen, C.-S. (2006). The influence of the country-of-origin image, product knowledge and product involvement on consumer purchase decisions: an empirical study of insurance and catering services in taiwan. Journal of consumer Marketing, 23(5):248 -265.
  23. Malhotra, R. and Malhotra, D. (2006). The impact of internet and e-commerce on the evolving business models in the financial services industry. International Journal of Electronic Business, 4(1):56-82.
  24. Molnár, B., Pisoni, G., & Tarcsi, Á. (2020). Data Lakes for Insurance Industry: Exploring Challenges and Opportunities for Customer Behaviour Analytics, Risk Assessment, and Industry Adoption. In ICETE (3) (pp. 127-134).
  25. Ostrowska, M., & Balcerowski, M. (2020). The Idea of Robotic Insurance Mediation in the Light of the European Union Law. In InsurTech: A Legal and Regulatory View (pp. 199-210). Springer, Cham.
  26. Pisoni, G., Molnár, B., & Tarcsi, Á. (2021). Data Science for Finance: Best-Suited Methods and Enterprise Architectures. Applied System Innovation, 4(3), 69.
  27. Puschmann, T. (2017). Fintech. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 59(1), 69-76.
  28. Saleiro, P., Kuester, B., Hinkson, L., London, J., Stevens, A., Anisfeld, A. & Ghani, R. (2018). Aequitas: A bias and fairness audit toolkit. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.05577. · arXiv
  29. Siddiqui, M. H. and Sharma, T. G. (2010). Measuring the customer perceived service quality for life insurance services: An empirical investigation. International Business Research, 3(3):171.
  30. Sokol, K., Santos-Rodriguez, R., & Flach, P. (2019). FAT Forensics: A Python toolbox for algorithmic fairness, accountability and transparency. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.05167. · arXiv
  31. Sharma, S., Henderson, J., & Ghosh, J. (2020, February). Certifai: A common framework to provide explanations and analyse the fairness and robustness of black-box models. In Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (pp. 166-172)
  32. Van Raaij,W. F. (2016). Understanding consumer financial behavior: Money management in an age of financial illiteracy. Springer.
  33. van Engers, T. M., & de Vries, D. M. (2019, December). Governmental Transparency in the Era of Artificial Intelligence. In JURIX (pp. 33-42).
  34. Verhoef, P. C., Lemon, K. N., Parasuraman, A., Roggeveen, A., Tsiros, M., and Schlesinger, L. A. (2009). Customer experience creation: Determinants, dynamics and management strategies. Journal of retailing, 85(1):31-41.
  35. Vultureanu-Albişi, A., & Bădică, C. (2021, August). Recommender Systems: An Explainable AI Perspective. In 2021 International Conference on INnovations in Intelligent SysTems and Applications (INISTA) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
  36. Xiao, J. J., & O'Neill, B. (2016). Consumer financial education and financial capability. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 40(6), 712-721.
  37. Xue, J., Zhu, E., Liu, Q., Wang, C., & Yin, J. (2018, June). A Joint Approach to Data Clustering and Robo- Advisor. In International Conference on Cloud Computing and Security (pp. 97-109). Springer, Cham.
  38. Zangerle, E., Bauer, C., & Said, A. (2021, September). Perspectives on the Evaluation of Recommender Systems (PERSPECTIVES). In Fifteenth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (pp. 794-795).
  39. Zhang, J., & Liu, P. (2012). Rational herding in microloan markets. Management science, 58(5), pp. 892- 912.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pisoni, G., & Díaz-Rodríguez, N.
Affiliations
  • Université Côte d'Azur (FR)
  • Universidad de Granada (ES)
Corresponding author
Pisoni, Galena
ORCID
Venue
Information Processing & Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-05
Volume
60
Issue
3
Pages
103273
ISSN
  • 0020-0271 (ISSN-L)
  • 0306-4573
DOI
10.1016/j.ipm.2023.103273
OpenAlex
W4320532297
Cited by
42
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 11
FWCI
10.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Information Processing & Management (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repository of the University of Granada (University of Granada) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Recommender Systems and Techniques
Keywords
responsible AI, human-centered AI, recommender systems, AI regulation, trustworthy AI, ethical AI, transparency, consumer acceptance, insurance companies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review