Cited by 351Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Ethics and Social Impacts of AISafety Systems Engineering in Autonomy

Toward Human-Understandable, Explainable AI

Hagras, Hani·2018·Computer

Abstract

Recent increases in computing power, coupled with rapid growth in the availability and quantity of data have rekindled our interest in the theory and applications of artificial intelligence (AI). However, for AI to be confidently rolled out by industries and governments, users want greater transparency through explainable AI (XAI) systems. The author introduces XAI concepts, and gives an overview of areas in need of further exploration—such as type-2 fuzzy logic systems—to ensure such systems can be fully understood and analyzed by the lay user.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/mc.2018.3620965

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the IS domain, explicability of AI is of major importance because it allows organizations to meet compliance requirements and is a key driver for acceptance of AI by managers, workforce, and consumers.

    “In the IS domain, explicability of AI is of major importance since it will not only allow organizations to meet compliance requirements when employing AI (e.g., by means of enabling independent third-party audits) but will also be a key driver for acceptance of AI by managers, the general workforce, and consumers (Hagras 2018;Rai 2020).”

    From Trustworthy artificial intelligence (2021) · cites this paper as Hagras 2018

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 15 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hagras, H.
Affiliations
University of Essex (GB)
Corresponding author
Hagras, Hani
Venue
Computer
Published
2018-09
Volume
51
Issue
9
Pages
28-36
ISSN
  • 0018-9162 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0814
OpenAlex
W2895144199
Cited by
350
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 71 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 73 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 1
FWCI
17.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Computer (publishedVersion)
  • Open Access at Essex (University of Essex) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy
Keywords
explainable AI, AI transparency, type-2 fuzzy logic systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review