The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Deep Feature Learning Model for Pneumonia Detection Applying a Combination of mRMR Feature Selection and Machine Learning Models
Abstract
Abstract Pneumonia is one of the diseases that people may encounter in any period of their lives. Approximately 18% of infectious diseases are caused by pneumonia. This disease may result in death in the following stages. In order to diagnose pneumonia as a medical condition, lung X-ray images are routinely examined by the field experts in the clinical practice. In this study, lung X-ray images that are available for the diagnosis of pneumonia were used. The convolutional neural network was employed as feature extractor, and some of existing convolutional neural network models that are AlexNet, VGG-16 and VGG-19 were utilized so as to realize this specific task. Then, the number of deep features was reduced from 1000 to 100 by using the minimum redundancy maximum relevance algorithm for each deep model. Accordingly, we achieved 100 deep features from each deep model, and we combined these features so as to provide an efficient feature set consisting of totally 300 deep features. In this step of the experiment, this feature set was given as an input to the decision tree, k-nearest neighbors, linear discriminant analysis, linear regression, and support vector machine learning models. Finally, all models ensured promising results, especially linear discriminant analysis yielded the most efficient results with an accuracy of 99.41%. Consequently, the results point out that the deep features provided robust and consistent features for pneumonia detection, and minimum redundancy maximum relevance method was found a beneficial tool to reduce the dimension of the feature set.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Friedman, J., & Tibshirani, R. (2001) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-21606-5 · Cited by 24,162
Evaluation: from precision, recall and F-measure to ROC, informedness, markedness and correlation
Powers, D. M. W. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.16061 · Cited by 5,440
Identifying Medical Diagnoses and Treatable Diseases by Image-Based Deep Learning
Kermany, D. S., Goldbaum, M., Cai, W., Valentim, C. C. S., Liang, H., Baxter, S. L., McKeown, A., Yang, G., Wu, X., Yan, F., et al. (2018) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.010 · Cited by 4,842
Convolutional neural networks: an overview and application in radiology
Yamashita, R., Nishio, M., Do, R. K. G., & Togashi, K. (2018) · Insights into Imaging · doi:10.1007/s13244-018-0639-9 · Cited by 4,682
Comparison of Deep Learning Approaches for Multi-Label Chest X-Ray Classification
Baltruschat, I. M., Nickisch, H., Grass, M., Knopp, T., & Saalbach, A. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-42294-8 · Cited by 455
Cited by
Sharma, S., & Guleria, K. (2023) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.018 · Cited by 359
Toğaçar, M., Ergen, B., & Cömert, Z. (2020) · Medical Hypotheses · doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2019.109531 · Cited by 310
Metadata
- Authors
- Toğaçar, M., Ergen, B., Cömert, Z., & Özyurt, F.
- Venue
- IRBM
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-08
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 212-222
- ISSN
- 1876-0988 (ISSN-L)
- 1959-0318
- OpenAlex
- W2984802304
- Cited by
- 297
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 21.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Deep Feature Learning Model for Pneumonia Detection Applying a Combination of mRMR Feature Selection and Machine Learning Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.irbm.2019.10.006
- The paper
- Toğaçar, M., Ergen, B., Cömert, Z., & Özyurt, F. (2020). A Deep Feature Learning Model for Pneumonia Detection Applying a Combination of mRMR Feature Selection and Machine Learning Models. IRBM. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irbm.2019.10.006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.