Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 359

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Deep Learning based model for the Detection of Pneumonia from Chest X-Ray Images using VGG-16 and Neural Networks

Open access
Sharma, Shagun, Guleria, Kalpna·2023·Procedia Computer Science

Abstract

Pneumonia is a viral infection which affects a significant proportion of individuals, especially in developing and penurious countries where contamination, overcrowded, and unsanitary living conditions are widespread, along with the lack of healthcare infrastructures. Pneumonia produces pericardial effusion, a disease wherein fluids fill the chest and create inhaling problems. It is a difficult step to recognize the presence of pneumonia quickly in order to receive treatment services and improve survival chances. Deep learning, is a field of artificial intelligence which is used in the successful development of prediction models. There are various ways of detecting pneumonia such as CT-scan, pulse oximetry, and many more among which the most common way is X-ray tomography. On the other hand, examining chest X-rays (CXR) is a tough process susceptible to subjective variability. In this work, a deep learning(DL) model using VGG16 is utilized for detecting and classifying pneumonia using two CXR image datasets. The VGG16 with Neural Networks (NN) provides an accuracy value of 92.15%, recall as 0.9308, precision as 0.9428, and F1-Score0.937 for the first dataset. Furthermore, the experiment using NN with VGG16 has been performed on another CXR dataset containing 6,436 images of pneumonia, normal and covid-19. The results for the second dataset provide accuracy, recall, precision, and F1-score as 95.4%, 0.954, 0.954, and 0.954, respectively. The research outcome exhibits that VGG16 with NN provides better performance than VGG16 with Support Vector Machine (SVM), VGG16 with K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), VGG16 with Random Forest (RF), and VGG16 with Naïve Bayes (NB) for both datasets. Further, the proposed work results exhibit improved performance results for both datasets 1 and 2 in comparison to existing models.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.018

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 19 references

Metadata

Authors
Sharma, S., & Guleria, K.
Venue
Procedia Computer Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023
Volume
218
Pages
357-366
ISSN
1877-0509 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4318570691
Cited by
359
References
19
FWCI
261.28
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
diamond

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Deep Learning based model for the Detection of Pneumonia from Chest X-Ray Images using VGG-16 and Neural Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.018
The paper
Sharma, S., & Guleria, K. (2023). A Deep Learning based model for the Detection of Pneumonia from Chest X-Ray Images using VGG-16 and Neural Networks. Procedia Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.018

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.