Cited by 23Sepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentMachine Learning in HealthcareArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Towards an Explainable Model for Sepsis Detection Based on Sensitivity Analysis

Open access
Chen, M., Hernández, A.·2022·IRBM

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.irbm.2021.05.006

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Complementary interpretability approaches, including LIME and Grad-CAM, were implemented in select studies, while sensitivity analysis was specifically employed in sepsis detection with deep neural networks.

    “Complementary approaches, including LIME and Grad-CAM, were implemented in select studies to provide additional insights into model behavior [14, 17, 19], while sensitivity analysis was specifically employed in sepsis detection with deep neural networks [25].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, M., & Hernández, A.
Affiliations
Southeast University (CN)
Venue
IRBM
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-02
Volume
43
Issue
1
Pages
75-86
ISSN
  • 1876-0988 (ISSN-L)
  • 1959-0318
OpenAlex
W3167342917
Cited by
23
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IRBM (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
INSERM
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
sepsis detection, explainable machine learning, model interpretability, sensitivity analysis, biomarker discovery, intensive care unit patients, electronic health records, feature selection, real-time prediction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review