Cited by 2,225Sepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentAbdominal Surgery and ComplicationsEmergency and Acute Care Studies

Time to treatment and mortality during mandated emergency care for sepsis.

Open access
Seymour, Christopher W., Gesten, Foster, Prescott, Hallie C., Friedrich, Marcus E., Iwashyna, Theodore J., Phillips, Gary S., Lemeshow, Stanley, Osborn, Tiffany +2 more·2017·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 2013, New York began requiring hospitals to follow protocols for the early identification and treatment of sepsis. However, there is controversy about whether more rapid treatment of sepsis improves outcomes in patients. METHODS: We studied data from patients with sepsis and septic shock that were reported to the New York State Department of Health from April 1, 2014, to June 30, 2016. Patients had a sepsis protocol initiated within 6 hours after arrival in the emergency department and had all items in a 3-hour bundle of care for patients with sepsis (i.e., blood cultures, broad-spectrum antibiotic agents, and lactate measurement) completed within 12 hours. Multilevel models were used to assess the associations between the time until completion of the 3-hour bundle and risk-adjusted mortality. We also examined the times to the administration of antibiotics and to the completion of an initial bolus of intravenous fluid. RESULTS: Among 49,331 patients at 149 hospitals, 40,696 (82.5%) had the 3-hour bundle completed within 3 hours. The median time to completion of the 3-hour bundle was 1.30 hours (interquartile range, 0.65 to 2.35), the median time to the administration of antibiotics was 0.95 hours (interquartile range, 0.35 to 1.95), and the median time to completion of the fluid bolus was 2.56 hours (interquartile range, 1.33 to 4.20). Among patients who had the 3-hour bundle completed within 12 hours, a longer time to the completion of the bundle was associated with higher risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality (odds ratio, 1.04 per hour; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02 to 1.05; P<0.001), as was a longer time to the administration of antibiotics (odds ratio, 1.04 per hour; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.06; P<0.001) but not a longer time to the completion of a bolus of intravenous fluids (odds ratio, 1.01 per hour; 95% CI, 0.99 to 1.02; P=0.21). CONCLUSIONS: More rapid completion of a 3-hour bundle of sepsis care and rapid administration of antibiotics, but not rapid completion of an initial bolus of intravenous fluids, were associated with lower risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and others.).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1703058

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Implementing standardized bundles can help ensure timely and proper sepsis care and has been associated with reductions in mortality.

    “Implementing standardized bundles can help ensure timely and proper sepsis care and has been associated with reductions in mortality [11-13].”
  • The observed reductions compare favorably with other sepsis intervention studies.

    “The observed reductions in ICU length of stay (1.8 days), mechanical ventilation duration (2.3 days), and 28-day mortality (5.7%) are clinically meaningful and compare favorably with other sepsis intervention studies22,23.”

    From Machine learning predicts sepsis deterioration trajectories. (2026) · cites this paper as [22]

    The Discussion compares compliance with sepsis-care steps across studies, but does not compare reductions in ICU stay, ventilation duration, or mortality with those from other sepsis interventions. The Results address time to treatment and in-hospital mortality, not the claimed comparison (searched: comparative outcomes, ICU length of stay, ventilation duration, and 28-day mortality). (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In a study of 49,331 patients treated at 149 New York hospitals, each additional hour from ED arrival to antimicrobial administration was associated with 1.04 increased odds of in-hospital mortality (p < 0.001), with 1.07 for patients receiving vasopressors and 1.01 for patients not on vasopressors.

    “In a study of 49,331 patients treated at 149 New York hospitals, each additional hour of time from ED arrival to administration of antimicrobials was associated with 1.04 increased odds of in-hospital mortality, p < 0.001 (1.07 (95% CI 1.05–1.09) for patients receiving vasopressors vs. 1.01 (95% CI 0.99–1.04) for patients not on vasopressors) [98].”
  • In patients with sepsis without shock, the association between time to antimicrobials and mortality within the first few hours from presentation is less consistent.

    “In patients with sepsis without shock, the association between time to antimicrobials and mortality within the first few hours from presentation is less consistent [98, 110].”
  • The mortality reduction associated with early antimicrobials appears strongest in patients with septic shock, with weaker associations in patients without septic shock.

    “The mortality reduction associated with early antimicrobials appears strongest in patients with septic shock, where a number of studies have reported a strong association between time-to-antibiotics and death in patients with septic shock but weaker associations in patients without septic shock [98, 109, 110].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Seymour, C. W., Gesten, F., Prescott, H. C., Friedrich, M. E., Iwashyna, T. J., Phillips, G. S., Lemeshow, S., Osborn, T., Terry, K. M., & Levy, M. M.
Affiliations
New York State Department of Health (US)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2017-06-08
Volume
376
Issue
23
Pages
2235-2244
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2614741637
Cited by
2,225
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 254 · 2025: 215 · 2024: 245 · 2023: 266 · 2022: 279 · 2021: 241 · 2020: 267 · 2019: 233 · 2018: 176 · 2017: 46 · 2015: 1
FWCI
154.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Commons@Becker (Washington University School of Medicine) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
  • Health Services Research and Development (13-079, 11-109)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute (P30CA016058)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (K08GM115859, R35GM119519)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Abdominal Surgery and Complications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
Keywords
sepsis, septic shock, time to treatment, sepsis protocol, antibiotic administration, fluid bolus, in-hospital mortality, emergency department care, risk-adjusted mortality, blood culture, lactate measurement, broad-spectrum antibiotics
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Combined Modality Therapy, Emergency Treatment, Female, Fluid Therapy, Humans, Infusions, Intravenous, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Shock, Septic, Multivariate Analysis, Hospital Mortality, Sepsis, Clinical Audit, Time-to-Treatment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review