Cited by 26Adaptive Control of Nonlinear SystemsFuzzy Logic and Control SystemsStability and Control of Uncertain Systems

Trajectory tracking control of a coaxial rotor drone: Time-delay estimation-based optimal model-free fuzzy logic approach

Glida, Hossam Eddine, Chelihi, Abdelghani, Abdou, Latifa, Sentouh, Chouki, Perozzi, Gabriele·2023·ISA Transactions

Abstract

This paper proposes a control algorithm for controlling the position and attitude of a coaxial rotor drone without knowing the model dynamics. To overcome the major drawback of model-dependent approaches, an optimal model-free fuzzy controller (OMFFC) based on the estimation of the unknown dynamic function of the system is proposed. A time-delay estimation (TDE) technique is effectively exploited to approximate the unknown dynamic function of the system. The estimation error is then offset using a robust adaptive fuzzy logic compensator. Based on Lyapunov stability arguments, the global asymptotic stability of the coaxial rotor drone system is proven. Moreover, a flower pollination-based algorithm is also proposed to generate the optimal parameters to address the trade-off between optimal tracking performance and the design conditions related to the closed-loop stability requirements. The numerical simulations illustrate how the proposed methodology leads to the best performance, as well as less computational complexity compared to the standard proportional-integral-derivative and time-delay estimation-based controllers in the presence of external disturbances.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.isatra.2022.12.015

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other controller methods commonly used in integration with the TDE mechanism for attenuation of system nonlinearities include PID, adaptive sliding mode controller (SMC), and fuzzy logic approach-based control methods.

    “Other controller methods commonly used in integration with the TDE mechanism for attenuation of system nonlinearities include, for example, the PID controller [18], adaptive sliding mode controller (SMC) [19], and fuzzy logic approach-based [20] control methods.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Glida, H. E., Chelihi, A., Abdou, L., Sentouh, C., & Perozzi, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Biskra (DZ)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Glida, Hossam Eddine
Venue
ISA Transactions
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-06
Volume
137
Pages
236-247
ISSN
0019-0578 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4312206849
Cited by
26
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4
FWCI
2.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ISA Transactions (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministère de l'Education Nationale, de l'Enseignement Superieur et de la Recherche
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
  • Ministère de l'Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche Scientifique
  • Université Polytechnique Hauts-de-France
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Fuzzy Logic and Control Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Stability and Control of Uncertain Systems
Keywords
trajectory tracking control, time delay estimation, flower pollination algorithm, global asymptotic stability, position and attitude control, disturbance rejection, unknown dynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review