Cited by 24Protease and Inhibitor MechanismsAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsUbiquitin and proteasome pathways

Exploring the landscape of ectodomain shedding by quantitative protein terminomics

Open access
Tsumagari, Kazuya, Chang, Chih-Hsiang, Ishihama, Yasushi·2021·iScience

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Ectodomain shedding is a proteolytic process that regulates the levels and functions of membrane proteins. Dysregulated shedding is linked to severe diseases, including cancer and Alzheimer's disease. However, the exact cleavage sites of shedding substrates remain largely unknown. Here, we explore the landscape of ectodomain shedding by generating large-scale, cell-type-specific maps of shedding cleavage sites. By means of N- and C-terminal peptide enrichment and quantitative mass spectrometry, we quantified protein termini in the culture media of 10 human cell lines and identified 489 cleavage sites on 163 membrane proteins whose proteolytic terminal fragments are downregulated in the presence of a broad-spectrum metalloprotease inhibitor. A major fraction of the presented cleavage sites was identified in a cell-type-specific manner and mapped onto receptors, cell adhesion molecules, and protein kinases and phosphatases. We confidently identified 86 cleavage sites as metalloprotease substrates by means of knowledge-based scoring.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102259

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Tsumagari, K., Chang, C.-H., & Ishihama, Y.
Affiliations
Kyoto University (JP)
Corresponding author
Ishihama, Yasushi
Venue
iScience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-04
Volume
24
Issue
4
Pages
102259
ISSN
2589-0042 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3135620441
Cited by
24
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5
FWCI
1.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • iScience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Kyoto University Research Information Repository (Kyoto University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology (18070870)
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (17H05667)
  • Japan Science and Technology Agency
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Protease and Inhibitor Mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
Keywords
ectodomain shedding, cleavage site, membrane proteins, metalloproteinases, adhesion molecules, protein kinases, phosphatase, protease inhibitors, Alzheimer's disease, cancer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review