Cited by 9Stress Responses and CortisolNeuroendocrine regulation and behaviorNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Mapping of Pituitary Stress-Induced Gene Regulation Connects Nrcam to Negative Emotions

Open access
Olsen, Maria Belland, Sannes, Ann-Christin, Yang, Kuan, Nielsen, Morten Birkeland, Einarsen, Ståle Valvatne, Christensen, Jan Olav, Pallesen, Ståle, Bjørås, Magnar +1 more·2022·iScience

Abstract

Environmental stressors such as repeated social defeat may initiate powerful activation of subconscious parts of the brain. Here, we examine the consequences of such stress (induced by resident-intruder paradigm) on the pituitary gland. In male stressed vs. control rats, by RNA- and bisulfite DNA sequencing, we found regulation of genes involved in neuron morphogenesis and communication. Among these, Neuronal cell adhesion molecule ( Nrcam ) showed reduced transcription and reduced DNA methylation in a region corresponding to intron 1 in human NRCAM . Also, genetic variability in this area was associated with altered stress response in male humans exposed to repeated social defeat in the form of abusive supervision. Thus, our data show that the pituitary gene expression may be affected by social stress and that genetic variability in NRCAM intron 1 region influences stress-induced negative emotions. We hope our shared datasets will facilitate further exploration of the motions triggered by social stressors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104953

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 58 · Cited by 9

Authors
Olsen, M. B., Sannes, A.-C., Yang, K., Nielsen, M. B., Einarsen, S. V., Christensen, J. O., Pallesen, S., Bjørås, M., & Gjerstad, J.
Affiliations
  • Oslo University Hospital (NO)
  • National Institute of Occupational Health (NO)
  • University of Bergen (NO)
Corresponding author
Olsen, Maria Belland
Venue
iScience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-09
Volume
25
Issue
9
Pages
104953
ISSN
2589-0042 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4292343606
Cited by
9
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • iScience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
pituitary gland, social stress, repeated social defeat, resident-intruder paradigm, NrCAM, neuronal cell adhesion molecule, DNA methylation, gene expression regulation, intron 1 polymorphism, abusive supervision, negative emotions, stress response

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review