The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison of remotely sensed water stages from LiDAR, topographic contours and SRTM
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Validation of surface height from shuttle radar topography mission using shuttle laser altimeter
Sun, G., Ranson, K. J., Kharuk, V. I., & Kovacs, K. (2003) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2003.09.001 · Cited by 233
Cited by
Impact of Urbanization on Flooding: The Thirusoolam Sub Watershed—A Case Study
Suriya, S., & Mudgal, B. V. (2012) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.05.008 · Cited by 384
The Use of LiDAR-Derived DEM in Flood Applications: A Review
Muhadi, N. A., Abdullah, A. F., Bejo, S. K., Mahadi, M. R., & Mijic, A. (2020) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs12142308 · Cited by 172
ANADEM: A Digital Terrain Model for South America
Laipelt, L., Comini de Andrade, B., Collischonn, W., de Amorim Teixeira, A., Paiva, R. C. D. D., & Ruhoff, A. (2024) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs16132321 · Cited by 79
Accuracy Assessment of the Global TanDEM-X Digital Elevation Model in a Mountain Environment
Gdulová, K., Marešová, J., & Moudrý, V. (2020) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2020.111724 · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Schumann, G., Matgen, P., Cutler, M. E. J., Black, A., Hoffmann, L., & Pfister, L.
- Venue
- ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-05
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 283-296
- ISSN
- 0924-2716 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2041168332
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of remotely sensed water stages from LiDAR, topographic contours and SRTM. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2007.09.004
- The paper
- Schumann, G., Matgen, P., Cutler, M. E. J., Black, A., Hoffmann, L., & Pfister, L. (2008). Comparison of remotely sensed water stages from LiDAR, topographic contours and SRTM. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2007.09.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
