The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Human factors in information security: The insider threat – Who can you trust these days?
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Designed at lowering exposure to semantic attacks, well maintained policy and organisational procedures help to mitigate and significantly lower the risk of a potential exploit occurring, without relying on the technical capabilities of users [Mitnick and Simon 2001; Hinson 2008; Colwill 2009].”
From A Taxonomy of Attacks and a Survey of Defence Mechanisms for Semantic Social Engineering Attacks (2016) · cites this paper as Colwill 2009
Citations
Cites
Dealing with the Malicious Insider
Jones, A., & Colwill, C. (2006) · Australasian Journal of Paramedicine · doi:10.4225/75/57b562dab876e · Cited by 19
Self-citationNoonan, T. E., & Archuleta, E. G. (2008) · Cited by 9
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Raywood, 2008, Companies being hit by moles who are employed by gangs to steal data, Secure Computing Magazine
- Royds, 2009, Virtual battlefield, CIR Magazine
- Wilding, 2007, Insiders are the biggest enemy, Strategic Risk Magazine
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Security and privacy in electronic health records: a systematic literature review.
Fernández-Alemán, J. L., Señor, I. C., Lozoya, P. Á. O., & Toval, A. (2013) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2012.12.003 · Cited by 675
Enterprise data breach: causes, challenges, prevention, and future directions
Cheng, L., Liu, F., & Yao, D. D. (2017) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1002/widm.1211 · Cited by 308
Homoliak, I., Toffalini, F., Guarnizo, J., Elovici, Y., & Ochoa, M. (2020) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3303771 · Cited by 255
Sohal, A. S., Sandhu, R., Sood, S. K., & Chang, V. I. C. (2017) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2017.08.016 · Cited by 252
Leveraging human factors in cybersecurity: an integrated methodological approach
Pollini, A., Callari, T. C., Tedeschi, A., Ruscio, D., Save, L., Chiarugi, F., & Guerri, D. (2021) · Cognition Technology & Work · doi:10.1007/s10111-021-00683-y · Cited by 259
Metadata
- Authors
- Colwill, C.
- Affiliations
- BT Group (United Kingdom) (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Colwill, Carl
- Venue
- Information Security Technical Report
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-11
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 186-196
- ISSN
- 1363-4127 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2083829472
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 19.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Information Security Technical Report (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › User Authentication and Security Systems
- Keywords
- insider threats, information security, human factors, trust, loyalty and betrayal, outsourcing, security risk management, security risk assessment, compliance, employee behavior, security awareness, third-party security, organizational culture, economic uncertainty, BT
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
