Cited by 675Electronic Health Records SystemsAccess Control and TrustThoreau and American Literature

Security and privacy in electronic health records: a systematic literature review.

Open access
Fernández-Alemán, José Luis, Señor, Inmaculada Carrión, Lozoya, Pedro Ángel Oliver, Toval, Ambrosio·2013·Journal of Biomedical Informatics

Abstract

Objective To report the results of a systematic literature review concerning the security and privacy of electronic health record (EHR) systems.Data sources Original articles written in English found in MEDLINE, ACM Digital Library, Wiley InterScience, IEEE Digital Library, Science@Direct, MetaPress, ERIC, CINAHL and Trip Database.Study selection Only those articles dealing with the security and privacy of EHR systems.Data extraction The extraction of 775 articles using a predefined search string, the outcome of which was reviewed by three authors and checked by a fourth.Results A total of 49 articles were selected, of which 26 used standards or regulations related to the privacy and security of EHR data. The most widely used regulations are the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and the European Data Protection Directive 95/46/EC. We found 23 articles that used symmetric key and/or asymmetric key schemes and 13 articles that employed the pseudo anonymity technique in EHR systems. A total of 11 articles propose the use of a digital signature scheme based on PKI (Public Key Infrastructure) and 13 articles propose a login/password (seven of them combined with a digital certificate or PIN) for authentication. The preferred access control model appears to be Role-Based Access Control (RBAC), since it is used in 27 studies. Ten of these studies discuss who should define the EHR systems' roles. Eleven studies discuss who should provide access to EHR data: patients or health entities. Sixteen of the articles reviewed indicate that it is necessary to override defined access policies in the case of an emergency. In 25 articles an audit-log of the system is produced. Only four studies mention that system users and/or health staff should be trained in security and privacy.Conclusions Recent years have witnessed the design of standards and the promulgation of directives concerning security and privacy in EHR systems. However, more work should be done to adopt these regulations and to deploy secure EHR systems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbi.2012.12.003

Cites

123 of 123 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AI and robotics in healthcare promise enhanced diagnostics, streamlined processes, and improved patient care.

    “Integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) and robotics in healthcare heralds a new era of medical innovation, promising enhanced diagnostics, streamlined processes, and improved patient care.”

    From Ethical implications of AI and robotics in healthcare: A review (2023) · cites this paper as [1]

    The Introduction discusses benefits expected from electronic health records, including improved quality of care, but does not attribute those benefits to AI or robotics. Searches for AI, robotics, diagnostics, and healthcare innovation found no passage addressing the claimed promise of those technologies. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 127 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [3]3. Sainz-Abajo B, La-Torre-Díez I, Bermejo-González P, García-Salcines E, Díaz- Pernas J, Díez-Higuera JF, et al. Evolución, beneficios y obstáculos en la implantación del Historial Clínico Electrónico en el sistema sanitario. RevistaeSalud.com 2010;6(22):1-14.
  2. [52]52. J.L. Fernández-Alemán et al. / Journal of Biomedical Informatics 46 (2013) 541-562
  3. [81]81. ISI Journal Citation Reports (JCR); 2011. <http://www.accesowok.fecyt.es/jcr/ > [accessed 07.12.12].
  4. [82]82. SCImago Journal Rank (SJR); 2010. <http://www.scimagojr.com/ journalrank.php/> [accessed 07.12.12].
  5. [83]83. CORE. COmputing Research and Education; 2010. <http://core.edu.au/ index.php/categories/conference/%20rankings/1/> [accessed 07.12.12].

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fernández-Alemán, J. L., Señor, I. C., Lozoya, P. Á. O., & Toval, A.
Affiliations
Universidad de Murcia (ES)
Corresponding author
Señor, Inmaculada Carrión
Venue
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-06
Volume
46
Issue
3
Pages
541-562
ISSN
1532-0464 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2128232860
Cited by
675
References
127
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 72 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 82 · 2018: 57 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 10
FWCI
7.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biomedical Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Spanish Ministry of Science and Technology (TIN2009-13718-C02-01, TIN2009-13718-C02-02)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Access Control and Trust
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Thoreau and American Literature
Keywords
electronic health records, health information security, privacy, HIPAA, Data Protection Directive 95/46/EC, public key infrastructure, digital signatures, pseudo-anonymity, role-based access control, access control, audit logging, user authentication
MeSH terms
Europe, United States, Computer Security, Privacy, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review