The positive outcomes of information security awareness training in companies – A case study
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Primary evaluation of awareness training is traditionally based on supervised testing in specific case studies.
“Primary evaluation is traditionally based on supervised testing in specific case studies [Eminagaoglu et al. 2009; McCrohan et al. 2010].”
From A Taxonomy of Attacks and a Survey of Defence Mechanisms for Semantic Social Engineering Attacks (2016) · cites this paper as Eminagaoglu et al. 2009
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Corallo, A., Lazoi, M., Lezzi, M., & Luperto, A. (2022) · Computers in Industry · doi:10.1016/j.compind.2022.103614 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
A Taxonomy of Attacks and a Survey of Defence Mechanisms for Semantic Social Engineering Attacks
Heartfield, R., & Loukas, G. (2016) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/2835375 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Exploring the Factors Affecting Sustainable Human Resource Productivity in Railway Lines
Azizi, N., Akhavan, P., Philsoophian, M., Davison, C., Haass, O., & Saremi, S. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14010225 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
- Authors
- Eminağaoğlu, M., Uçar, E., & Eren, Ş.
- Affiliations
- Yaşar University (TR)
- Trakya University (TR)
- Corresponding author
- Eminağaoğlu, Mete
- ORCID
- Eminağaoğlu, Mete
- Venue
- Information Security Technical Report
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-11
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 223-229
- ISSN
- 1363-4127 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2077514183
- Cited by
- 110
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 7.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Information Security Technical Report (publishedVersion)
- Trakya University's Institutional Open Access System (Trakya University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › User Authentication and Security Systems
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
- Keywords
- employee security awareness, password policies, security policy compliance, human factors in information security, public awareness campaigns, training effectiveness evaluation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
