Cited by 19Employee Performance and ManagementEmployee Performance and MotivationHuman Resource and Talent Management

Exploring the Factors Affecting Sustainable Human Resource Productivity in Railway Lines

Open access
Azizi, Neda, Akhavan, Peyman, Philsoophian, Maryam, Davison, Claire, Haass, Omid, Saremi, Shazi·2021·Sustainability

Abstract

This study aimed to identify the critical factors and items affecting the productivity of sustainable human resources in a Railway Operation Company based on the perceptions of employees and managers in the Human Resources Department. The study was motivated by research which was applied in terms of the objectives of the study and a descriptive survey was employed as the method. The statistical population of the current study consisted of all employees and managers of the Human Resources Department of the company. Random sampling was employed to collect data and the sample size was 191 people according to Morgan’s Table. Methods including the correlation coefficient, multivariate regression, and factor analysis were employed for data analysis. The findings highlight the main factors and items affecting labor productivity in the Urban and Suburban Railway Operation Company as perceived by the Human Resources Department, which were mainly related to human resources management and could be attributed to motivation and requirements for their effective contribution to the improvement of public welfare. Organizational Attitude and Culture, Leadership Style, and Bonus and Ergonomics were extracted as factors affecting productivity or as independent variables. This study is the first study that has aimed to discuss the perceptions of the Human Resources Department active in a company. As such, the study highlights the standpoint of the main decision makers in the Urban and Suburban Railway Operation Company with regard to labour productivity in the urban and suburban sector.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/su14010225

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Blockchain-based project management may increase the human life standard by reducing corruption.

    “Blockchain-based project management may increase the human life standard by reducing corruption [13,20].”

    From Blockchain Technology: Potential Applications for Public Sector E-Procurement and Project Management (2022) · cites this paper as [20]

    The References section mentions blockchain in the title of a smart-supply-chain paper and corruption in the title of a paper on government expenditure and productivity. Searches for blockchain, corruption, and life standards found no passage in this paper linking blockchain-based project management to reduced corruption or improved living standards. The retrieved passages have no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Most challenges of Blockchain are related to security concerns and privacy.

    “Most challenges are related to security concerns and privacy [20,24].”

    From Blockchain Technology: Potential Applications for Public Sector E-Procurement and Project Management (2022) · cites this paper as [20]

    The Introduction discusses human factors in implementing IT systems, while the References list a separate IoT–Blockchain paper. Neither passage addresses whether most blockchain challenges concern security and privacy; searches for blockchain, security, privacy, and challenges found no passage making that claim. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Akhavan, P. Knowledge management critical failure factors: A multi-case study, Vine. J. Inf. Knowl. Manag. Syst. 2014, 44, 22-41. [CrossRef] · DOI
  2. Ngozi, O.A.; Chinelo, U. Effect of work life balance and employee productivity in Nigerian Organizations. Int. J. Adv. Res. Manag. Soc. Sci. 2020, 9, 67-93.
  3. Mojelan, M.M.; Satari, S.; Soleimani, T.; Daryani, S.S. Factor analysis of human resource ptoductivity measurement indicators with emphasis on dimensions of organizational environment and leadership quality in service organizations. Humanidades Inovação 2021, 8, 162-176.
  4. Coelli, T.J.; Rao, D.S.P.; O'Donnell, C.J.; Battese, G.E. An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2005.
  5. Sarode, A.P.; Shirsath, M. The factors affecting employee work environment & it's relation with employee productivity. Int. J. Sci. Res. 2014, 3, 2735-2737.
  6. Leblebici, D. Impact of workplace quality on employee's productivity: Case study of a bank in Turkey. J. Bus. Econ. Financ. 2012, 1, 38-49.
  7. Atmaja, N.P.C.D.; Puspitawati, N.M.D. Effect of physical work environment through productivity employees job satisfaction as an intervening variable. Int. J. Bus. Econ. Law 2018, 5, 98-104.
  8. Harlie, M.; Basrie, F.H.; Zulfikar, R. Productivity & Loyality Development Models Asean Free Market Era by Managing a Quality System of Work, Work Development, Prizes and Education Innovations. Int. J. Latest Res. Eng. Technol. 2020, 6, 1-10.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Azizi, N., Akhavan, P., Philsoophian, M., Davison, C., Haass, O., & Saremi, S.
Affiliations
  • Torrens University Australia (AU)
  • Department of Industrial Engineering, Qom University of Technology, Qom 1519-37195, Iran
  • Qom University of Technology (IR)
  • RMIT University (AU)
  • School of Business, Torrens University Australia, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
Corresponding author
Azizi, Neda
Venue
Sustainability
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-12-26
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
225
ISSN
2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4206475124
Cited by
19
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3
FWCI
7.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Open Access at Essex (University of Essex) (acceptedVersion)
  • RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Employee Performance and Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employee Performance and Motivation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Human Resource and Talent Management
Keywords
labor productivity, railway operations, human resource management, employee motivation, organizational culture, leadership styles, bonuses, human factors, employee perceptions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review