CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 14

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Native acquisition of obsidian in colonial-era central California: Implications from Mission San José

Panich, Lee M., Griffin, Ben, Schneider, Tsim D.·2018·Journal of Anthropological Archaeology
DOI 10.1016/j.jaa.2018.02.002
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaa.2018.02.002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Characterization of obsidian and faunal remains shows how refuges-as an indigenous hinterland including commemorative trips to shell mounds-provided contexts for continuity and adjustment among Indian communities making social, material, and economic choices in the wake of missionization.

    “Characterization of obsidian (Panich et al. 2018) and faunal remains (Schneider 2015) shows how refuges-as an”

    From The Work of Boundaries: Critical Cartographies and the Archaeological Record of the Relatively Recent Past (2022) · cites this paper as Panich et al. 2018

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. Amick, 2015, The recycling of material culture today and during the Paleolithic, Quatern. Int., 361, 4, 10.1016/j.quaint.2014.08.059 · DOI
  2. Arkush, 2011, Native responses to European intrusion: cultural persistence and agency among mission neophytes in Spanish colonial California, Hist. Archaeol., 45, 62, 10.1007/BF03377306 · DOI
  3. Dibble, 2017, Major fallacies surrounding stone artifacts and assemblages, J. Archaeol. Method Theory, 24, 813, 10.1007/s10816-016-9297-8 · DOI
  4. Dietz, S.A. 1976. Echa-Tamal: A Study of Coast Miwok Acculturation. Unpublished master’s thesis, Department of Anthropology, San Francisco State University.
  5. Ellison, J.P., 2014. Flaked stone analysis. In: Garlinghouse, T., Peelo, S., D’Oro, S., Ellison, J., Brady, R.T., Blount, C.M., Hylkema, L., Archaeological Data Recovery for the St. Clare Residence Hall Storm Drain Project. Albion Environmental, Inc. Draft Report to Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, California, pp. 80–95.
  6. Estes, A., Medeiros, M.A., Allan, J. (Eds.). 2012. Report on Archaeological Data Recovery at CA-ALA-554, Pleasanton, California Volume I: Data Recovery. William Self Associates, Inc. Report to Property Development Centers and Safeway, Inc., Pleasanton, California.
  7. Farris, 1989, The Russian imprint on the colonization of California, vol. 1, 481
  8. Forde, 2017, Volcanic glass and iron nails: networks of exchange and material entanglements at late prehispanic and early colonial Achiutla, Oaxaca, Mexico, Int. J. Hist. Archaeol., 21, 485, 10.1007/s10761-016-0368-z · DOI
  9. Gonzalez, S.L. 2011. Creating Trails from Traditions: The Kashaya Pomo Interpretive Trail at Fort Ross State Historic Park. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley.
  10. Harrison, 2000, ‘Nowadays with glass’: regional variation in aboriginal bottle glass artefacts from Western Australia, Archaeol. Oceania, 35, 34, 10.1002/j.1834-4453.2000.tb00449.x · DOI
  11. Hull, 2016, Native Californians at the Presidio of San Francisco: analysis of lithic specimens from El Polín Spring, Int. J. Hist. Archaeol., 20, 264, 10.1007/s10761-016-0335-8 · DOI
  12. Hylkema, M., 2015. A review of arrowhead types and forms from Mission Santa Clara de Asís. Paper presented at the Society for California Archaeology Northern Data Sharing Meeting, Boulder Creek, California.
  13. Jackson, T.L., 1986. Late Prehistoric Obsidian Exchange in Central California. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, Sanford University.
  14. Jackson, T.L., 1989. Late prehistoric obsidian production and exchange in the North Coast Ranges, California. In: Hughes, R.E. (Ed.) Current Directions in California Obsidian Studies. Contributions of the University of California Archaeological Research Facility, No. 48. University of California, Berkeley, pp. 79–94.
  15. Liebmann, 2017, From landscapes of meaning to landscapes of signification in the American Southwest, Am. Antiq., 82, 642, 10.1017/aaq.2017.39 · DOI
  16. Lightfoot, K. G., Wake, T.A., Schiff, A.M., 1991. The Archaeology and Ethnohistory of Fort Ross, California: Vol. 1 Introduction. Contributions of the University of California Archaeological Research Facility No. 49. University of California, Berkeley.
  17. Lightfoot, K.G., Silliman, S.W., 1997. Chronology of archaeological deposits from the Fort Ross Beach and Native Alaskan Village Sites. In: Lightfoot, K.G., Schiff, A.M., Wake, T.A. (Eds.), The Archaeology and Ethnohistory of Fort Ross, California. Volume 2: The Native Alaskan Neighborhood: A Multiethnic Community at Colony Ross. Contributions of the University of California Archaeological Research Facility No. 55. University of California, Berkeley, pp. 337–354.
  18. Loendorf, 2013, Hohokam to Akimel O'Odham: obsidian acquisition at the historic period Sacate Site (GR-909), Gila River Indian Community, Arizona, Am. Antiq., 78, 266, 10.7183/0002-7316.78.2.266 · DOI
  19. Martindale, 2006, Identifying expedient glass tools from a post-contact Tsimshian village using low power (10–100×) magnification, J. Archaeol. Sci., 33, 414, 10.1016/j.jas.2005.08.007 · DOI
  20. Millhauser, 2011, Testing the accuracy of portable X-ray fluorescence to study Aztec and colonial obsidian supply at Xaltocan, Mexico, J. Archaeol. Sci., 38, 3141, 10.1016/j.jas.2011.07.018 · DOI
  21. Milliken, R., 1995. A Time of Little Choice: The Disintegration of Tribal Culture in the San Francisco Bay Area, 1769-1810. Ballena Press Anthropological Papers No. 43. Ballena Press, Menlo Park, California. · DOI
  22. Origer, T.M., 1982. Temporal Control in the Southern North Coast Ranges of California: The Application of Obsidian Hydration Analysis. Unpublished master’s thesis, Department of Anthropology, San Francisco State University.
  23. Panich, 2014, Native American consumption of shell and glass beads at Mission Santa Clara de Asís, Am. Antiq., 79, 730, 10.7183/0002-7316.79.4.730 · DOI
  24. Panich, 2016, Beyond the colonial curtain: investigating indigenous use of obsidian in Spanish California through the pXRF analysis of artifacts from Mission Santa Clara, J. Archaeol. Sci.: Rep., 5, 521
  25. Panich, 2014, Assessing the diversity of mission populations through the comparison of Native American residences at Mission Santa Clara de Asís, Int. J. Hist. Archaeol., 18, 467, 10.1007/s10761-014-0266-1 · DOI
  26. Panich, 2015, Expanding mission archaeology: a landscape approach to indigenous autonomy in colonial California, J. Anthropol. Archaeol., 40, 48, 10.1016/j.jaa.2015.05.006 · DOI
  27. Panich, 2018, Finding mid-19th century native settlements: cartographic and archaeological evidence from central California, J. Field Archaeol., 10.1080/00934690.2017.1416849 · DOI
  28. Parkman, 1983, A note concerning the archaeology of Annadel State Park, J. California Great Basin Anthropol., 5, 255
  29. Rodríguez-Alegría, 2008, Narratives of conquest, colonialism, and cutting-edge technology, Am. Anthropol., 110, 33, 10.1111/j.1548-1433.2008.00006.x · DOI
  30. Rodríguez-Alegría, 2013, Trade, tribute, and neutron activation: the colonial political economy of Xaltocan, Mexico, J. Anthropol. Archaeol., 32, 397, 10.1016/j.jaa.2013.07.001 · DOI
  31. Rosenthal, J., 2005. Chronology: Worsaae’s law and obsidian hydration dating: an evaluation of the method. In: Carpenter, K., Mikkelsen, P. (Eds.), Lithic Production and Craft Specialization in the Middle Period: Data Recovery Excavations at CA-NAP-172. Far Western Anthropological Research Group, Inc., Davis, California. Report to the City of Calistoga, California, pp. 66–75.
  32. Sampson, 2011, Continuity in stone tool use during the historic period in San Diego County, California, Pacific Coast Archaeol. Soc. Quart., 45, 49
  33. Scheiber, 2011, Obsidian source use in the greater Yellowstone area, Wyoming Basin, and central Rocky Mountains, Am. Antiq., 76, 372, 10.7183/0002-7316.76.2.372 · DOI
  34. Schiff, A.M., 1997. Lithic assemblage at the Fort Ross beach and Native Alaskan village sites. In: Lightfoot, K.G., Schiff, A.M., Wake, T.A. (Eds.), The Archaeology and Ethnohistory of Fort Ross, California. Volume 2: The Native Alaskan Neighborhood: A Multiethnic Community at Colony Ross. Contributions of the University of California Archaeological Research Facility No. 55. University of California, Berkeley, pp. 213–237.
  35. Schneider, T.D., 2010. Placing Refuge: Shell Mounds and the Archaeology of Colonial Encounters in the San Francisco Bay Area, California. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley.
  36. Schneider, 2015, Placing refuge and the archaeology indigenous hinterlands in colonial California, Am. Antiq., 80, 695, 10.7183/0002-7316.80.4.695 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Schneider, 2014, Obsidian production and mortuary practices at CA-NAP-399, Napa Valley: inferences from AMS radiocarbon assays, California Archaeol., 6, 191, 10.1179/1947461X14Z.00000000040 · DOI
  38. Silliman, 2005, Obsidian studies and the archaeology of 19th-century California, J. Field Archaeol., 30, 75, 10.1179/009346905791072468 · DOI
  39. Sobel, 2012, An archaeological test of the “exchange expansion model” of contact era change on the Northwest Coast, J. Anthropol. Archaeol., 31, 1, 10.1016/j.jaa.2011.09.001 · DOI
  40. Stemp, 2016, Coastal Maya obsidian tool use and socio-economy in the Late Postclassic-Early Spanish Colonial period at San Pedro, Ambergris Caye, Belize, J. Field Archaeol., 41, 162, 10.1080/00934690.2016.1156921 · DOI
  41. Stemp, 2011, Coastal Maya obsidian trade in the Late Postclassic to early colonial period: the view from San Pedro, Ambergris Caye, Belize, J. Island Coast. Archaeol., 6, 134, 10.1080/15564894.2010.487366 · DOI
  42. Vaquero, 2012, Temporal nature and recycling of Upper Paleolithic artifacts: the burned tools from the Molí del Salt site (Vimbodí i Poblet, northeastern Spain), J. Archaeol. Sci., 39, 2785, 10.1016/j.jas.2012.04.024 · DOI
  43. Whitaker, 2008, Linguistic boundaries as barriers to exchange, J. Archaeol. Sci., 35, 1104, 10.1016/j.jas.2007.08.004 · DOI
  44. Whyte, 2014, Gifts of the ancestors: secondary lithic recycling in Appalachia Summit prehistory, Am. Antiq., 79, 679, 10.7183/0002-7316.79.4.679679 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Panich, L. M., Griffin, B., & Schneider, T. D.
Venue
Journal of Anthropological Archaeology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-06
Volume
50
Pages
1-11
ISSN
0278-4165
DOI
10.1016/j.jaa.2018.02.002
Cited by
14
References
0
Language
en
Licence
Funders
  • Collaborative Research Grant
  • National Science Foundation (1558987, 1559666)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review