Cited by 12Archaeological and Geological StudiesArchaeology and ancient environmental studiesLanguage and cultural evolution

Socio-political organization in the Aceramic Neolithic of southwestern Asia: The complex evolution of socio-political complexity

Rosenberg, Michael, Rocek, Thomas R.·2019·Journal of Anthropological Archaeology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaa.2019.01.006

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rosenberg, M., & Rocek, T. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Delaware (US)
  • University of Hradec Králové (CZ)
Corresponding author
Rosenberg, Michael
Venue
Journal of Anthropological Archaeology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-06
Volume
54
Pages
17-30
ISSN
0278-4165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2912431792
Cited by
12
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
11.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Anthropological Archaeology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Archaeological and Geological Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
Keywords
sociopolitical organization, Aceramic Neolithic, ideology and practice, social control, egalitarian leadership, cultural evolution, West Asia, political hierarchy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review